» Articles » PMID: 32789586

Seasonal Variation, Temperature, Day Length, and IVF Outcomes from Fresh Cycles

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2020 Aug 14
PMID 32789586
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: It is known that delivery rates from spontaneous conception vary according to season which may be due to cultural or environmental factors; however, conflicting data exist regarding whether outcomes from IVF are also seasonally dependent. The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that the season at oocyte retrieval is associated with livebirth after fresh transfer.

Methods: Dates of oocyte retrieval for all autologous cycles in our IVF program between January 2012 and December 2017 were categorized by season. Dates were linked to local temperature (min, max, average) and day length obtained from meteorological records. Average maximum temperature and day length were categorized into tertiles. Multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for age and quadratic age, were used to model odds (aOR) of implantation, clinical pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, and livebirth.

Results: Patient characteristics were similar across seasons. As expected, temperature and day length varied by season. When compared with cycles started during winter, there was no difference in the age-adjusted odds of livebirth for the other three seasons (spring: aOR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.82-1.13; summer: aOR: 1.05, 0.90-1.23; fall: aOR: 0.98, 0.84-1.15). There was a positive linear trend between temperature and odds of implantation, and clinical pregnancy (p value, test for linear trend (implantation, p = 0.02; clinical pregnancy, p = 0.01)) but no association with livebirth for temperature or day length.

Conclusions: We found that season at oocyte retrieval was not associated with livebirth, contrary to patterns seen in naturally conceived populations. However, our data did suggest modestly higher odds of clinical pregnancy for retrievals in June and July, and that higher temperature at time of retrieval was associated with higher odds of clinical pregnancy but not livebirth.

Citing Articles

Summer versus winter: the impact of the seasons on oocyte quality in in vitro fertilization cycles.

Cho R, Aseka M, Toso K, Passos A, Kulak Junior J, Amaral V Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2024; 70(9):e20240408.

PMID: 39292085 PMC: 11415068. DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.20240408.


Embryo transfers performed during daylight savings time led to reduced live birth rates in older patients.

Pelayo R, Xu S, Walter J J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023; 40(11):2639-2647.

PMID: 37667016 PMC: 10643731. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02920-x.


Season and temperature do not affect cumulative live birth rate and time to live birth in fertilization.

Du M, Zhang J, Wei Z, Li L, Liu X, Liu M Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1156299.

PMID: 37424872 PMC: 10325717. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1156299.


Seasonal fluctuation of in vitro fertilization encounters in the United States.

McGough A, Doody K, Foy O, Harris C, Mandelbaum R, Matsuo K J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023; 40(5):1099-1107.

PMID: 36943573 PMC: 10239406. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02777-0.


Influence of climatic conditions in the mesothermal climate area on pregnancies following elective fresh single blastocyst transfer.

Matsumoto H, Hashimoto S, Mizuno S, Fukuda A, Morimoto Y J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022; 39(12):2789-2797.

PMID: 36471202 PMC: 9790825. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02668-w.


References
1.
Russell D, Douglas A, ALLAN T . Changing seasonality of birth--a possible environmental effect. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993; 47(5):362-7. PMC: 1059829. DOI: 10.1136/jech.47.5.362. View

2.
Lam D, Miron J . Seasonality of births in human populations. Soc Biol. 1991; 38(1-2):51-78. DOI: 10.1080/19485565.1991.9988772. View

3.
Becker S . Seasonal patterns of births and conception throughout the world. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1991; 286:59-72. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-5913-5_6. View

4.
Choe S, Jun Y, Lee W, Yoon T, Kim S . Association between ambient air pollution and pregnancy rate in women who underwent IVF. Hum Reprod. 2018; 33(6):1071-1078. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey076. View

5.
Rojansky N, Benshushan A, Meirsdorf S, Lewin A, Laufer N, Safran A . Seasonal variability in fertilization and embryo quality rates in women undergoing IVF. Fertil Steril. 2000; 74(3):476-81. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00669-5. View