» Articles » PMID: 32785746

An Analytical Review of Different Approaches to Wastewater Discharge Standards with Particular Emphasis on Nutrients

Overview
Journal Environ Manage
Date 2020 Aug 14
PMID 32785746
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite the implementation of strict legal standards concerning nutrient loads within wastewater discharges in all European Union (EU) Member States it was not possible to achieve good ecological and chemical water status by 2015 in all EU countries. The main reasons for this situation are the imperfections of the legislation tools regarding the standardization of wastewater quality and the methodology of determining the conditions for wastewater introduction into receivers. The study aims to review and analyze the currently existing in various countries legal regulations setting the standards for wastewater discharged into receivers, which were intended for surface water protection and eutrophication mitigation. Besides the EU effluent standards, the regional and national regulations in chosen EU Member States (e.g., Germany, Sweden, and Denmark) have been reviewed. Moreover, the Helsinki Commission recommendations for signatory countries within the Baltic Sea catchment and the approaches for wastewater quality standardization in non-EU countries (e.g., Russia, Belarus, Switzerland, China, USA, Canada, and Dubai) were assessed. The analysis of the reviewed legal regulations allowed to diversify the methodological approaches for setting effluent quality standards in different regions and countries and to assess the effectiveness of existing legal tools in the field of eutrophication mitigation with the consideration of the environmental and economic reasonability. The results suggest that the receiver-oriented policies used among others in Switzerland and China are the most reasonable in terms of eutrophication mitigation.

Citing Articles

Pollution Mitigation in Vermicelli Wastewater: Integrated Fenton and Aerobic Sludge Treatment for Water Quality Improvement.

Nguyen P, Pham V, Viet Le H, Kumar P, Meraj G Scientifica (Cairo). 2024; 2024:8133617.

PMID: 39474316 PMC: 11519079. DOI: 10.1155/2024/8133617.


Native microalgal-bacterial consortia from the Ecuadorian Amazon region: an alternative to domestic wastewater treatment.

Lopez-Patino A, Cardenas-Orrego A, Torres A, Navarrete D, Champagne P, Ochoa-Herrera V Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1338547.

PMID: 38468686 PMC: 10925762. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1338547.


The Future of Municipal Wastewater Reuse Concentrate Management: Drivers, Challenges, and Opportunities.

Finnerty C, Childress A, Hardy K, Hoek E, Mauter M, Plumlee M Environ Sci Technol. 2024; 58(1):3-16.

PMID: 38193155 PMC: 10785764. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c06774.


The Use of Neural Network Modeling Methods to Determine Regional Threshold Values of Hydrochemical Indicators in the Environmental Monitoring System of Waterbodies.

Tunakova Y, Novikova S, Valiev V, Baibakova E, Novikova K Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(13).

PMID: 37448009 PMC: 10347246. DOI: 10.3390/s23136160.


Optimization Conditions to Obtain Cationic Polyacrylamide Emulsion Copolymers with Desired Cationic Degree for Different Wastewater Treatments.

Nguyen T, Nguyen L, Nguyen T, Le M, Kieu L, To H Polymers (Basel). 2023; 15(12).

PMID: 37376339 PMC: 10303386. DOI: 10.3390/polym15122693.


References
1.
Bodik I, Blstakova A, Sedlacek S, Hutnan M . Biodiesel waste as source of organic carbon for municipal WWTP denitrification. Bioresour Technol. 2009; 100(8):2452-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.11.050. View

2.
Warwick C, Guerreiro A, Soares A . Sensing and analysis of soluble phosphates in environmental samples: a review. Biosens Bioelectron. 2012; 41:1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2012.07.012. View

3.
Eggen R, Hollender J, Joss A, Scharer M, Stamm C . Reducing the discharge of micropollutants in the aquatic environment: the benefits of upgrading wastewater treatment plants. Environ Sci Technol. 2014; 48(14):7683-9. DOI: 10.1021/es500907n. View

4.
Iho A, Ribaudo M, Hyytiainen K . Water protection in the Baltic Sea and the Chesapeake Bay: institutions, policies and efficiency. Mar Pollut Bull. 2015; 93(1-2):81-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.02.011. View

5.
Nakajima J, Murata Y, Sakamoto M . Comparison of several methods for BAP measurement. Water Sci Technol. 2006; 53(2):329-36. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2006.067. View