» Articles » PMID: 32779132

Robotic Hepatic Parenchymal Transection: a Two-surgeon Technique Using Ultrasonic Dissection and Irrigated Bipolar Coagulation

Overview
Journal J Robot Surg
Publisher Springer
Date 2020 Aug 12
PMID 32779132
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Liver transection is the most challenging part of hepatectomy due to the risk of hemorrhage which is associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality and reduced long-term survival. Parenchymal ultrasonic dissection (UD) with bipolar coagulation (BPC) has been widely recognized as a safe, effective, and standard technique during open and laparoscopic hepatectomy. We here introduce our technique of robotic liver transection using UD with BPC and report on short-term perioperative outcomes. From a single-institution prospective liver surgery database, we identified patients who underwent robotic liver resection. Demographic, anesthetic, perioperative, and oncologic data were analyzed. Fifty patients underwent robotic liver resection using UD and BPC for liver malignancies (n = 42) and benign lesions (n = 8). The median age of the patients was 67 years and 28 were male. According to the difficulty scoring system, 60% (n = 30) of liver resection were considered difficult. Three cases (6%) were converted to open surgery. The median operative time was 240 min, and the median estimated blood loss was 200 ml; 2 patients required operative transfusions. The overall complication rate was 38% (grade I, 29; grade II, 15; grade III, 3; grade IV, 1). Seven patients (14%) experienced biliary leakage. The median length of hospital stay post-surgery was 7 (range 3-20) days. The R0 resection rate was 92%. Robotic parenchymal transection using UD and irrigated BPC appears a simple, safe, and effective technique. However, our results must be confirmed in larger series or in randomized controlled trials.

Citing Articles

Robotic liver parenchymal transection techniques: a comprehensive overview and classification.

Palucci M, Giannone F, Del Angel-Millan G, Alagia M, Del Basso C, Lodin M J Robot Surg. 2024; 19(1):36.

PMID: 39738738 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02200-5.


Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resections: propensity-matched comparison of two-center experience.

Balzano E, Bernardi L, Roesel R, Vagelli F, Ghinolfi D, Tincani G Surg Endosc. 2023; 37(10):8123-8132.

PMID: 37721588 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10358-6.


Non-Stick Liver Parenchymal Transection With Saline-Linked Bipolar Clamp-Crush Technique in Robotic Liver Resection.

Kajiwara M, Fujikawa T, Naito S, Sasaki T, Nakashima R, Hasegawa S Cureus. 2023; 15(3):e36401.

PMID: 37090277 PMC: 10114974. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.36401.


Robotic Right Posterior Sectionectomy by Intrafascial Approach for Pancreas Neuroendocrine Liver Metastasis.

Saadoun J, Vanbrugghe C, Fara R, Camerlo A Ann Surg Oncol. 2023; 30(7):4276.

PMID: 36949294 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13272-2.


ASO Author Reflections: Mini-Invasive Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Resection: Could Robots Be the Key?.

Camerlo A, Seux H Ann Surg Oncol. 2022; 29(4):2408-2409.

PMID: 35006504 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11219-z.


References
1.
Giulianotti P, Coratti A, Sbrana F, Addeo P, Bianco F, Buchs N . Robotic liver surgery: results for 70 resections. Surgery. 2010; 149(1):29-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.04.002. View

2.
Liu G, Ji X, Lu T, Duan L, Jia W, Liu Y . Comprehensive multi-omics analysis identified core molecular processes in esophageal cancer and revealed GNGT2 as a potential prognostic marker. World J Gastroenterol. 2020; 25(48):6890-6901. PMC: 6938725. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i48.6890. View

3.
Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller D, Buell J, Kaneko H, Han H . Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg. 2015; 261(4):619-29. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001184. View

4.
Nguyen K, Laurent A, Dagher I, Geller D, Steel J, Thomas M . Minimally invasive liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional, international report of safety, feasibility, and early outcomes. Ann Surg. 2009; 250(5):842-8. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bc789c. View

5.
Strasberg S, Phillips C . Use and dissemination of the brisbane 2000 nomenclature of liver anatomy and resections. Ann Surg. 2012; 257(3):377-82. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825a01f6. View