» Articles » PMID: 32776163

Assessment of Adherence to Cancer-associated Venous Thromboembolism Guideline and Pharmacist's Impact on Anticoagulant Therapy

Overview
Specialties Critical Care
Oncology
Date 2020 Aug 11
PMID 32776163
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) can cause many unfavorable health outcomes. Many institutions have published guidelines, but implementation of these guidelines in cancer clinics is still under investigation. This study aimed to evaluate the guideline adherence and identify potential gaps between the recommendations and their implications in clinics.

Methods: A prospective study was conducted between September and December 2018 at oncology inpatient and ambulatory settings. The guideline adherence rate was assessed for inpatients during hospital stay by using 8 criteria developed based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guideline on Cancer Associated Venous Thromboembolic Disease Version 1.2018. Guideline-based recommendations were proposed to the consultant physician in case of non-adherence. Khorana risk scores were calculated for each patient at outpatient clinics. In cases where the score was found to be ≥ 3, the consultant physician was informed.

Results: A total of 100 inpatients and 200 ambulatory patients were included in the study. The guideline adherence rates ranged between 59 and 100% for 5 out of 8 pre-defined criteria, whereas the rate for others remained at 0-1%. A significant increase was observed in the adherence rates for initiation of prophylaxis at admission and determination of correct dose of an anticoagulant after recommendations being implemented (p < 0.001, McNemar test). Eleven patients were identified as at high-risk of VTE at ambulatory setting; however, an initiation of an anticoagulant was not considered by the consultant physicians.

Conclusion: There are potential problems in implementation of guideline recommendations, which leads to low adherence rate. Therefore, liason with pharmacists and consultants for individual risk assessment and monitoring of patients will help to increase guideline adherence rates.

Citing Articles

Determining the perceptions and practices of oncologists regarding venous thromboembolism risk assessment in ambulatory cancer patients: A qualitative study.

Tariq M, Mikhael E PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0316801.

PMID: 39761243 PMC: 11703059. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316801.


Venous thromboembolism prevention program implementation in a community oncology practice: a cohort study.

Ades S, Resnick Y, Barker J, Martin K, Thomas R, Libby K Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024; 38:100866.

PMID: 39280881 PMC: 11402208. DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100866.


Pharmacy practice and policy research in Türkiye: a systematic review of literature.

Gulpinar G, Pehlivanli A, Babaar Z J Pharm Policy Pract. 2024; 17(1):2385939.

PMID: 39139388 PMC: 11321099. DOI: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2385939.


Incidence of thromboembolism and associated factors in multiple myeloma patients treated with immunomodulatory drugs: a retrospective analysis in Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

da Costa I, Menezes de Padua C, Drummond P, Silveira L, Malta J, Dos Santos R Support Care Cancer. 2023; 32(1):35.

PMID: 38103099 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08251-y.


Comparison of three risk assessment models for thromboembolism in multiple myeloma patients receiving immunomodulators: a Brazilian historical cohort.

da Costa I, Menezes de Padua C, Drummond P, Silveira L, Malta J, Dos Santos R J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2023; 56(1):147-155.

PMID: 37133703 DOI: 10.1007/s11239-023-02817-7.


References
1.
Khorana A, Francis C, Culakova E, Kuderer N, Lyman G . Thromboembolism is a leading cause of death in cancer patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy. J Thromb Haemost. 2007; 5(3):632-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02374.x. View

2.
Khorana A, Dalal M, Lin J, Connolly G . Incidence and predictors of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among ambulatory high-risk cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in the United States. Cancer. 2012; 119(3):648-55. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27772. View

3.
Di Nisio M, Carrier M, Lyman G, Khorana A . Prevention of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical cancer patients: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost. 2014; 12(10):1746-9. DOI: 10.1111/jth.12683. View

4.
Key N, Khorana A, Kuderer N, Bohlke K, Lee A, Arcelus J . Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis and Treatment in Patients With Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2019; 38(5):496-520. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.01461. View

5.
Khorana A, Otten H, Zwicker J, Connolly G, Bancel D, Pabinger I . Prevention of venous thromboembolism in cancer outpatients: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost. 2014; 12(11):1928-31. DOI: 10.1111/jth.12725. View