» Articles » PMID: 32773591

Smartphone Frailty Screening: Development of a Quantitative Early Detection Method for the Frailty Syndrome

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Aug 11
PMID 32773591
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Frailty syndrome in older population generates formidable social cost. The early detection of "prefrail" stage is essential so that interventions could be performed to prevent deterioration. The purpose of this study was to organize appropriate physical performance tests into a computerized early frailty screening platform, called frailty assessment tools (FAT) system, to detect individuals who are in the prefrail stage.

Methods: Four switches, one distance meter, and one power measure were adopted to build the FAT system that could perform six physical performance tests including single leg standing (SLS), repeated chair rise, timed up and go, self-selected walking speed, functional reach, and grip power. Participants over 65 years old were recruited and classified into three groups according to Fried criteria. The differences in variables between prefrail and robust groups were compared by the χ test, independent samples t test, and Mann-Whitney U test, for nominal variables, normal, and non-normal distributive continuous variables, respectively. The statistically significant level was set at 0.05 (α = 0.05).

Results: Only SLS did not reach significance to distinguish prefrail from robust. Among 35 participants (73.23 ± 5.70 years old), the FAT score predicted that 90.73 ± 19.95% of pre-frail subjects and 15.01 ± 25.25% of robust subjects were in the prefrail stage.

Conclusion: The FAT system, which provides results immediately, is an advantageous alternative to traditional manual measurements. The use of the FAT score for predicting the prefrail stage will help to provide early intervention to prevent individuals from progressing into frailty. The FAT system provides a more convenient and comprehensive frailty screening. Using this computerized automatic screening platform, it may be possible to expand the scope of frailty prevention.

Citing Articles

Sensor-based systems for the measurement of Functional Reach Test results: a systematic review.

Francisco L, Duarte J, Godinho A, Zdravevski E, Albuquerque C, Pires I PeerJ Comput Sci. 2024; 10:e1823.

PMID: 38660214 PMC: 11042010. DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1823.


Global frailty screening tools: Review and application of frailty screening tools from 2001 to 2023.

Deng Y, Sato N Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2024; 13(1):1-11.

PMID: 38404737 PMC: 10883846. DOI: 10.5582/irdr.2023.01113.


Mobile Data Gathering and Preliminary Analysis for the Functional Reach Test.

Francisco L, Duarte J, Albuquerque C, Albuquerque D, Pires I, Coelho P Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(4).

PMID: 38400459 PMC: 10892343. DOI: 10.3390/s24041301.


Effect of baduanjin on the fall and balance function in middle-aged and elderly people: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xiao Y, Luo Q, Yu Y, Cao B, Wu M, Luo Y Medicine (Baltimore). 2021; 100(37):e27250.

PMID: 34664870 PMC: 8447992. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027250.

References
1.
Sasaki H, Kasagi F, Yamada M, Fujita S . Grip strength predicts cause-specific mortality in middle-aged and elderly persons. Am J Med. 2007; 120(4):337-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.04.018. View

2.
Ensrud K, Ewing S, Taylor B, Fink H, Stone K, Cauley J . Frailty and risk of falls, fracture, and mortality in older women: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007; 62(7):744-51. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/62.7.744. View

3.
Abellan van Kan G, Rolland Y, Andrieu S, Bauer J, Beauchet O, Bonnefoy M . Gait speed at usual pace as a predictor of adverse outcomes in community-dwelling older people an International Academy on Nutrition and Aging (IANA) Task Force. J Nutr Health Aging. 2009; 13(10):881-9. DOI: 10.1007/s12603-009-0246-z. View

4.
Al Snih S, Markides K, Ray L, Ostir G, Goodwin J . Handgrip strength and mortality in older Mexican Americans. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002; 50(7):1250-6. DOI: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50312.x. View

5.
Kage H, Okuda M, Nakamura I, Kunitsugu I, Sugiyama S, Hobara T . Measuring methods for functional reach test: comparison of 1-arm reach and 2-arm reach. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 90(12):2103-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.07.021. View