» Articles » PMID: 32772634

Attractive Flu Shot: A Behavioral Approach to Increasing Influenza Vaccination Uptake Rates

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2020 Aug 11
PMID 32772634
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We suggest and examine a behavioral approach to increasing seasonal influenza vaccine uptake. Our idea combines behavioral effects generated by a dominated option, together with more traditional tools, such as providing information and recommendations. Making use of the seasonal nature of the flu, our treatments present participants with 2 options to receive the shot: early in the season, which is recommended and hence "attractive," or later. Three additional layers are examined: 1) mentioning that the vaccine is more likely to run out of stock late in the season, 2) the early shot is free while the late one costs a fee, and 3) the early shot carries a monetary benefit. We compare vaccination intentions in these treatments to those of a control group who were invited to receive the shot regardless of timing. Using a sample of the Israeli adult population ( = 3271), we found positive effects of all treatments on vaccination intentions, and these effects were significant for 3 of the 4 treatments. In addition, the vast majority of those who are willing to vaccinate intend to get the early shot. Introducing 2 options to get vaccinated against influenza (early or late) positively affects intentions to receive the flu shot. In addition, this approach nudges participants to take the shot in early winter, a timing that has been shown to be more cost-effective.

Citing Articles

Using an inferior decoy alternative to nudge COVID-19 vaccination.

Grimani A, Stoffel S, Von Wagner C, Sniehotta F, Vlaev I Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):1672.

PMID: 39799148 PMC: 11724972. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-84853-8.


Understanding herpes zoster vaccine hesitancy and information asymmetry: a qualitative study in China.

Wang X, Xing Y, Zhang E, Dai Z, Li Y, Shang S Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1429522.

PMID: 39286749 PMC: 11402811. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1429522.


Nudging toward vaccination: a systematic review.

Renosa M, Landicho J, Wachinger J, Dalglish S, Barnighausen K, Barnighausen T BMJ Glob Health. 2021; 6(9).

PMID: 34593513 PMC: 8487203. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006237.


Associations of COVID-19 risk perception with vaccine hesitancy over time for Italian residents.

Caserotti M, Girardi P, Rubaltelli E, Tasso A, Lotto L, Gavaruzzi T Soc Sci Med. 2021; 272:113688.

PMID: 33485215 PMC: 7788320. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113688.


Promoting Influenza Vaccination among Staff of Nursing Homes According to Behavioral Insights: Analyzing the Choice Architecture during a Nudge-Based Intervention.

Lorini C, Ierardi F, Gatteschi C, Galletti G, Collini F, Peracca L Vaccines (Basel). 2020; 8(4).

PMID: 33053868 PMC: 7712811. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines8040600.

References
1.
Bohm R, Meier N, Korn L, Betsch C . Behavioural consequences of vaccination recommendations: An experimental analysis. Health Econ. 2017; 26 Suppl 3:66-75. DOI: 10.1002/hec.3584. View

2.
Schmitz H, Wubker A . What determines influenza vaccination take-up of elderly Europeans?. Health Econ. 2010; 20(11):1281-97. DOI: 10.1002/hec.1672. View

3.
Shafir E, Simonson I, Tversky A . Reason-based choice. Cognition. 1993; 49(1-2):11-36. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90034-s. View

4.
Canning H, Phillips J, Allsup S . Health care worker beliefs about influenza vaccine and reasons for non-vaccination--a cross-sectional survey. J Clin Nurs. 2005; 14(8):922-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01190.x. View

5.
Patel M, Volpp K, Small D, Wynne C, Zhu J, Yang L . Using Active Choice Within the Electronic Health Record to Increase Influenza Vaccination Rates. J Gen Intern Med. 2017; 32(7):790-795. PMC: 5481246. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-017-4046-6. View