» Articles » PMID: 32769438

Child- and Environment-Related Factors Influencing Daily Cochlear Implant Use: A Datalog Study

Overview
Journal Ear Hear
Date 2020 Aug 10
PMID 32769438
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To understand the varying levels of daily cochlear implant (CI) use in children, previous studies have investigated factors that may be of influence. The objective of this study was to investigate the degree with which new child-related and environment-related characteristics were associated with consistent CI use.

Design: The design of this study was retrospective. Data were reviewed of 81 children (51% females, mean age 6.4 years with a range of 1.3 to 17.7 years) who received a CI between 2012 and 2019. Developmental status, quantified burden of comorbidity, hearing experience, and hearing environment were investigated for correlation with consistency in daily CI use. The CIs datalog was used to objectively record the wearing times. Associations were examined using univariate correlation analyses and a linear regression analysis.

Results: On average, the CI was worn 8.6 hr per day and 59% of the children wore it more than 8 hr daily. The latter children's hearing performance was significantly higher than that of the others. Consistency in CI use correlated significantly with the child-related characteristics chronological age, nonverbal intelligence quotient (IQ), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class, pre CI acoustic experience, CI experience, and one of the environment related characteristics "parental communication mode." In a multivariate linear regression model, consistency in CI use was significantly dependent on nonverbal IQ and parental communication mode. These together accounted for 47% of the variation in daily CI use.

Conclusions: The findings indicate that children with lower nonverbal IQ scores and low exposure to oral communication by their parents are at risk of inconsistent CI use.

Citing Articles

Fitting parameters in children with cochlear implants and severe additional disabilities.

Seebens Y, Metzeld D, Helbig S, Schafer K Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 282(1):63-77.

PMID: 39136774 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-08890-9.

References
1.
Ray J, Wright T, Fielden C, Cooper H, Donaldson I, Proops D . Non-users and limited users of cochlear implants. Cochlear Implants Int. 2008; 7(1):49-58. DOI: 10.1179/cim.2006.7.1.49. View

2.
Archbold S, Nikolopoulos T, Lloyd-Richmond H . Long-term use of cochlear implant systems in paediatric recipients and factors contributing to non-use. Cochlear Implants Int. 2008; 10(1):25-40. DOI: 10.1179/cim.2009.10.1.25. View

3.
Fryauf-Bertschy H, Tyler R, Kelsay D, Gantz B, Woodworth G . Cochlear implant use by prelingually deafened children: the influences of age at implant and length of device use. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997; 40(1):183-99. DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4001.183. View

4.
Easwar V, Sanfilippo J, Papsin B, Gordon K . Factors Affecting Daily Cochlear Implant Use in Children: Datalogging Evidence. J Am Acad Audiol. 2016; 27(10):824-838. DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.15138. View

5.
Bayley N . Consistency and variability in the growth of intelligence from birth to eighteen years. 1949. J Genet Psychol. 1991; 152(4):573-604. DOI: 10.1080/00221325.1991.9914714. View