» Articles » PMID: 32766819

Assessing the Potential for Unintended Microbial Consequences of Routine Chlorhexidine Bathing for Prevention of Healthcare-associated Infections

Overview
Journal Clin Infect Dis
Date 2020 Aug 9
PMID 32766819
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) is an antiseptic that is widely used in healthcare due to its excellent safety profile and wide spectrum of activity. Daily bathing with CHG has proven to be effective in the prevention of healthcare-associated infections and multidrug-resistant pathogen decolonization. Despite the proven benefits of CHG use, there remain concerns and unanswered questions about the potential for unintended microbial consequences of routine CHG bathing. This review aims to explore some of these questions.

Citing Articles

Chlorhexidine vs Routine Foot Washing to Prevent Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Lydecker A, Kim J, Robinson G, Johnson J, Brown C, Petruccelli C JAMA Netw Open. 2025; 8(2):e2460087.

PMID: 39964684 PMC: 11836759. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.60087.


Implementation of 2% Chlorhexidine Bathing to Reduce Healthcare-Associated Infections Among Patients in the Intensive Care Unit.

Chang H, Liu T, Huang P, Chen C, Yen C, Chen H Microorganisms. 2025; 13(1).

PMID: 39858834 PMC: 11767414. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms13010065.


Chlorhexidine gluconate versus povidone-iodine for nasal bacteria decolonization before transsphenoidal surgery in patients with pituitary neuroendocrine tumors: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial.

Qian J, Lin J, Liu J, Gong Y, Zheng S, Mei L Int J Surg. 2024; 111(1):697-705.

PMID: 39172724 PMC: 11745714. DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002052.


Insights into the Cytotoxicity and Irritant Potential of Chlorhexidine Digluconate: An In Vitro and In Ovo Safety Screening.

Dinu S, Matichescu A, Buzatu R, Marcovici I, Geamantan-Sirbu A, Semenescu A Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(7).

PMID: 39057008 PMC: 11276539. DOI: 10.3390/dj12070221.


Decolonization and Pathogen Reduction Approaches to Prevent Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare-Associated Infections.

Mangalea M, Halpin A, Haile M, Elkins C, McDonald L Emerg Infect Dis. 2024; 30(6):1069-1076.

PMID: 38781679 PMC: 11138981. DOI: 10.3201/eid3006.231338.


References
1.
Musuuza J, Sethi A, Roberts T, Safdar N . Analysis of Multidrug-Resistant Organism Susceptibility to Chlorhexidine Under Usual Clinical Care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017; 38(6):729-731. PMC: 6785994. DOI: 10.1017/ice.2017.53. View

2.
Koljalg S, Naaber P, Mikelsaar M . Antibiotic resistance as an indicator of bacterial chlorhexidine susceptibility. J Hosp Infect. 2002; 51(2):106-13. DOI: 10.1053/jhin.2002.1204. View

3.
Moore G, Schelenz S, Borman A, Johnson E, Brown C . Yeasticidal activity of chemical disinfectants and antiseptics against Candida auris. J Hosp Infect. 2017; 97(4):371-375. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.08.019. View

4.
Hardy K, Sunnucks K, Gil H, Shabir S, Trampari E, Hawkey P . Increased Usage of Antiseptics Is Associated with Reduced Susceptibility in Clinical Isolates of . mBio. 2018; 9(3). PMC: 5974466. DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00894-18. View

5.
DeMarco C, Cushing L, Frempong-Manso E, Seo S, Jaravaza T, Kaatz G . Efflux-related resistance to norfloxacin, dyes, and biocides in bloodstream isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007; 51(9):3235-9. PMC: 2043220. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00430-07. View