» Articles » PMID: 32756597

Dr. Answer AI for Prostate Cancer: Clinical Outcome Prediction Model and Service

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2020 Aug 7
PMID 32756597
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The importance of clinical outcome prediction models using artificial intelligence (AI) is being emphasized owing to the increasing necessity of developing a clinical decision support system (CDSS) employing AI. Therefore, in this study, we proposed a "Dr. Answer" AI software based on the clinical outcome prediction model for prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.

Methods: The Dr. Answer AI was developed based on a clinical outcome prediction model, with a user-friendly interface. We used 7,128 clinical data of prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy from three hospitals. An outcome prediction model was developed to calculate the probability of occurrence of 1) tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) staging, 2) extracapsular extension, 3) seminal vesicle invasion, and 4) lymph node metastasis. Random forest and k-nearest neighbors algorithms were used, and the proposed system was compared with previous algorithms.

Results: Random forest exhibited good performance for TNM staging (recall value: 76.98%), while k-nearest neighbors exhibited good performance for extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and lymph node metastasis (80.24%, 98.67%, and 95.45%, respectively). The Dr. Answer AI software consisted of three primary service structures: 1) patient information, 2) clinical outcome prediction, and outcomes according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline.

Conclusion: The proposed clinical outcome prediction model could function as an effective CDSS, supporting the decisions of the physicians, while enabling the patients to understand their treatment outcomes. The Dr. Answer AI software for prostate cancer helps the doctors to explain the treatment outcomes to the patients, allowing the patients to be more confident about their treatment plans.

Citing Articles

Predictive Models for Assessing Patients' Response to Treatment in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Lawlor A, Lin C, Rivas J, Ibanez L, Abad Lopez P, Willemse P Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024; 63:126-135.

PMID: 38596781 PMC: 11001619. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.03.012.


Interpretability of Clinical Decision Support Systems Based on Artificial Intelligence from Technological and Medical Perspective: A Systematic Review.

Xu Q, Xie W, Liao B, Hu C, Qin L, Yang Z J Healthc Eng. 2023; 2023:9919269.

PMID: 36776958 PMC: 9918364. DOI: 10.1155/2023/9919269.


Dr. Answer AI for prostate cancer: Intention to use, expected effects, performance, and concerns of urologists.

Rho M, Park J, Moon H, Kim C, Jeon S, Kang M Prostate Int. 2022; 10(1):38-44.

PMID: 35510100 PMC: 9042771. DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2021.09.001.

References
1.
Marvel M, Epstein R, Flowers K, Beckman H . Soliciting the patient's agenda: have we improved?. JAMA. 1999; 281(3):283-7. DOI: 10.1001/jama.281.3.283. View

2.
Kassan E, Williams R, Kelly S, Barry S, Penek S, Fishman M . Men's use of an Internet-based decision aid for prostate cancer screening. J Health Commun. 2011; 17(6):677-97. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2011.579688. View

3.
Hararah M, Stokes W, Jones B, Oweida A, Ding D, McDermott J . Nomogram for preoperative prediction of nodal extracapsular extension or positive surgical margins in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2018; 83:73-80. PMC: 6886366. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.06.005. View

4.
Potter S, Epstein J, Partin A . Seminal vesicle invasion by prostate cancer: prognostic significance and therapeutic implications. Rev Urol. 2006; 2(3):190-5. PMC: 1476128. View

5.
Jensen C, Carl J, Boesen L, Langkilde N, Ostergaard L . Assessment of prostate cancer prognostic Gleason grade group using zonal-specific features extracted from biparametric MRI using a KNN classifier. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019; 20(2):146-153. PMC: 6370983. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12542. View