» Articles » PMID: 32750487

Cystatin C and Muscle Mass in Patients With Heart Failure

Overview
Journal J Card Fail
Date 2020 Aug 5
PMID 32750487
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from cystatin C (eGFRcys) is often considered a more accurate method to assess GFR compared with an eGFR from creatinine (eGFRcr) in the setting of heart failure (HF) and sarcopenia, because cystatin C is hypothesized to be less affected by muscle mass than creatinine. We evaluated (1) the association of muscle mass with cystatin C, (2) the accuracy of eGFRcys, and (3) the association of eGFRcys with mortality given muscle mass.

Methods And Results: We included 293 patients admitted with HF. Muscle mass was estimated with a validated creatinine excretion-based equation. Accuracy of eGFRcys and eGFRcr was compared with measured creatinine clearance. Cystatin C and creatinine were 31.7% and 59.9% higher per 14 kg higher muscle mass at multivariable analysis (both P < .001). At lower muscle mass, eGFRcys and eGFRcr overestimated the measured creatinine clearance. At higher muscle mass, eGFRcys underestimated the measured creatinine clearance, but eGFRcr did not. After adjusting for muscle mass, neither eGFRcys nor eGFRcr were associated with mortality (both P > .19).

Conclusions: Cystatin C levels were associated with muscle mass in patients with HF, which could potentially decrease the accuracy of eGFRcys. In HF where aberrations in body composition are common, eGFRcys, like eGFRcr, may not provide accurate GFR estimations and results should be interpreted cautiously.

Citing Articles

Associations between serum cystatin C and fall reports in an Elderly population.

Han J, Wang R, Bai L, Liu Y, Liao M, Zhang L Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):26054.

PMID: 39472731 PMC: 11522524. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-77138-7.


Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Outcomes in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Crugnola W, Cinquina A, Mattimore D, Bitzas S, Schwartz J, Zaidi S Biomedicines. 2024; 12(7).

PMID: 39062177 PMC: 11275105. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12071604.


Pre-donation assessment of cystatin C to improve prediction of pre- and post-donation GFR in potential living kidney donors.

van der Weijden J, Kremer D, Westenberg L, Sanders J, Pol R, Nolte I Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2024; 39(11):1856-1866.

PMID: 38479785 PMC: 11648953. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfae065.


Association of Ratio of eGFR by Cystatin C and Creatinine with Mortality in Heart Failure.

Roehm B, McAdams M, Gordon J, Grodin J, Hedayati S Kidney360. 2024; .

PMID: 38345438 PMC: 11093527. DOI: 10.34067/KID.0000000000000384.


Serum Cystatin C as a Risk Factor for Supratherapeutic Digoxin Concentration in Elderly Patients with Heart Failure and Chronic Kidney Disease.

Lu J, Liu T Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2024; 24(2):303-311.

PMID: 38300453 DOI: 10.1007/s40256-024-00629-5.


References
1.
Beddhu S, Samore M, Roberts M, Stoddard G, Pappas L, Cheung A . Creatinine production, nutrition, and glomerular filtration rate estimation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003; 14(4):1000-5. DOI: 10.1097/01.asn.0000057856.88335.dd. View

2.
Knight E, Verhave J, Spiegelman D, Hillege H, de Zeeuw D, Curhan G . Factors influencing serum cystatin C levels other than renal function and the impact on renal function measurement. Kidney Int. 2004; 65(4):1416-21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00517.x. View

3.
Yoo J, Kim S, Kim Y, Lee B, Lee M, Jeong S . Estimation of renal function in patients with liver cirrhosis: Impact of muscle mass and sex. J Hepatol. 2019; 70(5):847-854. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.12.030. View

4.
Vinge E, Lindergard B, Nilsson-Ehle P, Grubb A . Relationships among serum cystatin C, serum creatinine, lean tissue mass and glomerular filtration rate in healthy adults. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2000; 59(8):587-92. DOI: 10.1080/00365519950185076. View

5.
Macdonald J, Marcora S, Jibani M, Roberts G, Kumwenda M, Glover R . GFR estimation using cystatin C is not independent of body composition. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006; 48(5):712-9. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.07.001. View