Diagnostic Accuracy of Evaluation of Suspected Syncope in the Emergency Department: Usual Practice Vs. ESC Guidelines

Overview

Journal BMC Emerg Med

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Emergency Medicine

Date 2020 Aug 5

PMID 32746777

Citations 11

Authors

Veera K van Wijnen

Reinold O B Gans

Wouter Wieling

Jan C Ter Maaten

Mark P M Harms

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Syncope is a frequent reason for referral to the emergency department. After excluding a potentially life-threatening condition, the second objective is to find the cause of syncope. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the treating physician in usual practice and to compare this to the diagnostic accuracy of a standardised evaluation, consisting of thorough history taking and physical examination by a research physician.

Methods: This prospective cohort study included suspected (pre) syncope patients without an identified serious underlying condition who were assessed in the emergency department. Patients were initially seen by the initial treating physician and the usual evaluation was performed. A research physician, blinded to the findings of the initial treating physician, then performed a standardised evaluation according to the ESC syncope guidelines. Diagnostic accuracy (proportion of correct diagnoses) was determined by expert consensus after long-term follow-up.

Results: One hundred and one suspected (pre) syncope patients were included (mean age 59 ± 20 years). The usual practice of the initial treating physicians did not in most cases follow ESC syncope guidelines, with orthostatic blood pressure measurements made in only 40% of the patients. Diagnostic accuracy by the initial treating physicians was 65% (95% CI 56-74%), while standardised evaluation resulted in a diagnostic accuracy of 80% (95% CI 71-87%; p = 0.009). No life-threatening causes were missed.

Conclusions: Usual practice of the initial treating physician resulted in a diagnostic accuracy of 65%, while standardised practice, with an emphasis on thorough history taking, increased diagnostic accuracy to 80%. Results suggest that the availability of additional resources does not result in a higher diagnostic accuracy than standardised evaluation, and that history taking is the most important diagnostic test in suspected syncope patients. Netherlands Trial Registration: NTR5651. Registered 29 January 2016, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/5532.

Citing Articles

Comparison of autonomic nervous system dysfunction, arterial stiffness, and heart rate recovery according to spinal cord injury level.

Choi S, Kim C, Joo M J Int Med Res. 2024; 52(8):3000605241266591.

PMID: 39180298 PMC: 11344901. DOI: 10.1177/03000605241266591.

Recent Advances and Future Directions in Syncope Management: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.

Martone A, Parrini I, Ciciarello F, Galluzzo V, Cacciatore S, Massaro C J Clin Med. 2024; 13(3).

PMID: 38337421 PMC: 10856004. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13030727.

A cross-sectional nationwide survey of guideline based syncope units in the Netherlands: the SU-19 score-a novel validation for best practices.

van Zanten S, de Jong J, Scheffer M, Kaal E, de Groot J, de Lange F Europace. 2024; 26(1).

PMID: 38190741 PMC: 10793571. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae002.

Diagnostic and societal impact of implementing the syncope guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (SYNERGY study).

Ghariq M, van den Hout W, Dekkers O, Bootsma M, de Groot B, Groothuis J BMC Med. 2023; 21(1):365.

PMID: 37743496 PMC: 10518933. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-03056-6.

Syncope with autonomic dysfunction assessed with the Thai-COMPASS 31 questionnaire.

Singtokum N, Amornvit J, Kerr S, Chokesuwattanaskul R Heliyon. 2023; 9(6):e17035.

PMID: 37360110 PMC: 10285133. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17035.

References

Wieling W, van Dijk N, de Lange F, Olde Nordkamp L, Thijs R, Van Dijk J . History taking as a diagnostic test in patients with syncope: developing expertise in syncope. Eur Heart J. 2014; 36(5):277-80. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu478. View

Brignole M, Ungar A, Bartoletti A, Ponassi I, Lagi A, Mussi C . Standardized-care pathway vs. usual management of syncope patients presenting as emergencies at general hospitals. Europace. 2006; 8(8):644-50. DOI: 10.1093/europace/eul071. View

Linzer M, Yang E, Estes 3rd N, Wang P, Vorperian V, Kapoor W . Diagnosing syncope. Part 1: Value of history, physical examination, and electrocardiography. Clinical Efficacy Assessment Project of the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 1997; 126(12):989-96. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-126-12-199706150-00012. View

Ricci F, De Caterina R, Fedorowski A . Orthostatic Hypotension: Epidemiology, Prognosis, and Treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 66(7):848-860. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.1084. View

Wieling W, Thijs R, Linzer M, de Lange F, Ross A, van Dijk J . Great expectations: what patients with unexplained syncope desire. J Intern Med. 2015; 279(3):259-64. DOI: 10.1111/joim.12450. View

Benditt D . Syncope risk assessment in the emergency department and clinic. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2013; 55(4):376-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2012.10.010. View

Van Dijk J, Thijs R, Benditt D, Wieling W . A guide to disorders causing transient loss of consciousness: focus on syncope. Nat Rev Neurol. 2009; 5(8):438-48. DOI: 10.1038/nrneurol.2009.99. View

Soteriades E, Evans J, Larson M, Chen M, Chen L, Benjamin E . Incidence and prognosis of syncope. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347(12):878-85. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa012407. View

Sutton R, van Dijk N, Wieling W . Clinical history in management of suspected syncope: A powerful diagnostic tool. Cardiol J. 2014; 21(6):651-7. DOI: 10.5603/CJ.2014.0097. View

10.

Kenny R, Brignole M, Dan G, Deharo J, Van Dijk J, Doherty C . Syncope Unit: rationale and requirement--the European Heart Rhythm Association position statement endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society. Europace. 2015; 17(9):1325-40. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euv115. View

11.

van Wijnen V, Finucane C, Harms M, Nolan H, Freeman R, Westerhof B . Noninvasive beat-to-beat finger arterial pressure monitoring during orthostasis: a comprehensive review of normal and abnormal responses at different ages. J Intern Med. 2017; 282(6):468-483. DOI: 10.1111/joim.12636. View

12.

Wieling W, Thijs R, van Dijk N, Wilde A, Benditt D, Van Dijk J . Symptoms and signs of syncope: a review of the link between physiology and clinical clues. Brain. 2009; 132(Pt 10):2630-42. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awp179. View

13.

Huff J, Decker W, Quinn J, Perron A, Napoli A, Peeters S . Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with syncope. Ann Emerg Med. 2007; 49(4):431-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.02.001. View

14.

Brignole M, Moya A, de Lange F, Deharo J, Elliott P, Fanciulli A . 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope. Eur Heart J. 2018; 39(21):1883-1948. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy037. View

15.

Disertori M, Brignole M, Menozzi C, Raviele A, Rizzon P, Santini M . Management of patients with syncope referred urgently to general hospitals. Europace. 2003; 5(3):283-91. DOI: 10.1016/s1099-5129(03)00049-7. View

16.

Toarta C, Mukarram M, Arcot K, Kim S, Gaudet S, Sivilotti M . Syncope Prognosis Based on Emergency Department Diagnosis: A Prospective Cohort Study. Acad Emerg Med. 2017; 25(4):388-396. DOI: 10.1111/acem.13346. View

17.

Shen W, Sheldon R, Benditt D, Cohen M, Forman D, Goldberger Z . 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline for the evaluation and management of patients with syncope: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Heart Rhythm. 2017; 14(8):e155-e217. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.03.004. View

18.

Olde Nordkamp L, van Dijk N, Ganzeboom K, Reitsma J, Luitse J, Dekker L . Syncope prevalence in the ED compared to general practice and population: a strong selection process. Am J Emerg Med. 2009; 27(3):271-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.02.022. View

19.

Krediet C, Jardine D, Wieling W . Dissection of carotid sinus hypersensitivity: the timing of vagal and vasodepressor effects and the effect of body position. Clin Sci (Lond). 2011; 121(9):389-96. DOI: 10.1042/CS20100607. View

20.

Blanc J, Lher C, Touiza A, Garo B, LHer E, Mansourati J . Prospective evaluation and outcome of patients admitted for syncope over a 1 year period. Eur Heart J. 2002; 23(10):815-20. DOI: 10.1053/euhj.2001.2975. View