» Articles » PMID: 32745492

Data Augmentation for Deep-learning-based Electroencephalography

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2020 Aug 4
PMID 32745492
Citations 60
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Data augmentation (DA) has recently been demonstrated to achieve considerable performance gains for deep learning (DL)-increased accuracy and stability and reduced overfitting. Some electroencephalography (EEG) tasks suffer from low samples-to-features ratio, severely reducing DL effectiveness. DA with DL thus holds transformative promise for EEG processing, possibly like DL revolutionized computer vision, etc. NEW METHOD: We review trends and approaches to DA for DL in EEG to address: Which DA approaches exist and are common for which EEG tasks? What input features are used? And, what kind of accuracy gain can be expected?

Results: DA for DL on EEG begun 5 years ago and is steadily used more. We grouped DA techniques (noise addition, generative adversarial networks, sliding windows, sampling, Fourier transform, recombination of segmentation, and others) and EEG tasks (into seizure detection, sleep stages, motor imagery, mental workload, emotion recognition, motor tasks, and visual tasks). DA efficacy across techniques varied considerably. Noise addition and sliding windows provided the highest accuracy boost; mental workload most benefitted from DA. Sliding window, noise addition, and sampling methods most common for seizure detection, mental workload, and sleep stages, respectively.

Comparing With Existing Methods: Percent of decoding accuracy explained by DA beyond unaugmented accuracy varied between 8 % for recombination of segmentation and 36 % for noise addition and from 14 % for motor imagery to 56 % for mental workload-29 % on average.

Conclusions: DA increasingly used and considerably improved DL decoding accuracy on EEG. Additional publications-if adhering to our reporting guidelines-will facilitate more detailed analysis.

Citing Articles

Advances in Neuroimaging and Deep Learning for Emotion Detection: A Systematic Review of Cognitive Neuroscience and Algorithmic Innovations.

Halkiopoulos C, Gkintoni E, Aroutzidis A, Antonopoulou H Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(4).

PMID: 40002607 PMC: 11854508. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15040456.


Driver fatigue recognition using limited amount of individual electroencephalogram.

Seo P, Kim H, Kim K Biomed Eng Lett. 2025; 15(1):143-157.

PMID: 39781053 PMC: 11704104. DOI: 10.1007/s13534-024-00431-x.


Machine-Learning-Based Depression Detection Model from Electroencephalograph (EEG) Data Obtained by Consumer-Grade EEG Device.

Suzuki K, Laohakangvalvit T, Sugaya M Brain Sci. 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 39595870 PMC: 11591631. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14111107.


Enhancing neuroprosthesis calibration: the advantage of integrating prior training over exclusive use of new data.

Thomson C, Tully T, Stone E, Morrell C, Scheme E, Warren D J Neural Eng. 2024; 21(6).

PMID: 39569866 PMC: 11605518. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad94a7.


Generative AI with WGAN-GP for boosting seizure detection accuracy.

Abou-Abbas L, Henni K, Jemal I, Mezghani N Front Artif Intell. 2024; 7:1437315.

PMID: 39415942 PMC: 11480023. DOI: 10.3389/frai.2024.1437315.