» Articles » PMID: 32742498

Value of Combining PET/CT and Clinicopathological Features in Predicting EGFR Mutation in Lung Adenocarcinoma with Bone Metastasis

Overview
Journal J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2020 Aug 4
PMID 32742498
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is the most common target for precision treatment in metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. We investigated the predictive role of F-FDG PET/CT and clinicopathological features for EGFR mutations in lung adenocarcinoma with bone metastasis. Seventy-five lung adenocarcinoma patients with histologically confirmed bone metastasis were included. They all received EGFR status test and PET/CT before systemic treatment. The differences of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in primary tumor (pSUVmax), regional lymph node (nSUVmax) and bone metastasis (bmSUVmax) between different EGFR status groups were compared, alongside with common clinicopathological features. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate predictors of EGFR mutations. EGFR mutations were found in 37 patients (49.3%). EGFR mutations were more common in females, non-smokers, expression of Thyroid Transcription Factor-1 (TTF-1) and NaspinA. Low bmSUVmax was significantly associated with EGFR mutations, while no significant difference was observed in pSUVmax and nSUVmax. Multivariate analysis showed that bmSUVmax ≤7, non-smoking, expression of TTF-1 were predictors of EGFR mutations. The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.84 for the combination of the three factors. Low bmSUVmax is more frequently in EGFR mutations, and bmSUVmax is an independent predictor of EGFR mutations. Combining bmSUVmax with other clinicopathological features could forecast the EGFR status in lung adenocarcinoma with unavailable EGFR gene testing.

Citing Articles

[F]FDG PET/CT performs better than CT in determining the bone biopsy site : randomized controlled clinical trial.

Chang Y, Gu Y, Ruan S, Xu S, Sun J, Jiang Z Cancer Imaging. 2024; 24(1):160.

PMID: 39582078 PMC: 11587546. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-024-00804-6.


Efficacy Evaluation of Zoledronic Acid Combined with Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Lung Cancer Spinal Metastases on Computed Tomography Images on Intelligent Algorithms.

Cao W, Zhang P, Dong N, Hu A, Xiao J, Zou D Comput Math Methods Med. 2022; 2022:6431852.

PMID: 35572820 PMC: 9106519. DOI: 10.1155/2022/6431852.


A Review of the Correlation Between Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Status and F-FDG Metabolic Activity in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Jiang M, Zhang X, Chen Y, Chen P, Guo X, Ma L Front Oncol. 2022; 12:780186.

PMID: 35515138 PMC: 9065410. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.780186.


Development and Validation of a Concise Prediction Scoring System for Asian Lung Cancer Patients with Mutation Before Treatment.

An W, Fan W, Zhong F, Wang B, Wang S, Gan T Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2022; 21:15330338221078732.

PMID: 35234540 PMC: 8894628. DOI: 10.1177/15330338221078732.


Predictive and Prognostic Biomarkers for Lung Cancer Bone Metastasis and Their Therapeutic Value.

Chai X, Yinwang E, Wang Z, Wang Z, Xue Y, Li B Front Oncol. 2021; 11:692788.

PMID: 34722241 PMC: 8552022. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.692788.

References
1.
Mok T, Wu Y, Thongprasert S, Yang C, Chu D, Saijo N . Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(10):947-57. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810699. View

2.
Huang C, Yen R, Cheng M, Hsu Y, Wei P, Tsai Y . Correlation of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography maximal standardized uptake value and EGFR mutations in advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Med Oncol. 2009; 27(1):9-15. DOI: 10.1007/s12032-008-9160-1. View

3.
Lindeman N, Cagle P, Beasley M, Chitale D, Dacic S, Giaccone G . Molecular testing guideline for selection of lung cancer patients for EGFR and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors: guideline from the College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular.... J Mol Diagn. 2013; 15(4):415-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2013.03.001. View

4.
Schrijver W, van der Groep P, Hoefnagel L, Ter Hoeve N, Peeters T, Moelans C . Influence of decalcification procedures on immunohistochemistry and molecular pathology in breast cancer. Mod Pathol. 2016; 29(12):1460-1470. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.116. View

5.
Liu H, Zhu R, Liu C, Ma R, Wang L, Chen B . Evaluation of Decalcification Techniques for Rat Femurs Using HE and Immunohistochemical Staining. Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2017:9050754. PMC: 5299168. DOI: 10.1155/2017/9050754. View