» Articles » PMID: 32734511

Biomechanics of Implant Fixation in Osteoporotic Bone

Overview
Publisher Current Science
Date 2020 Aug 1
PMID 32734511
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose Of Review: The purpose of this review is to critically evaluate the current literature regarding implant fixation in osteoporotic bone.

Recent Findings: Clinical studies have not only demonstrated the growing prevalence of osteoporosis in patients undergoing total joint replacement (TJR) but may also indicate a significant gap in screening and treatment of this comorbidity. Osteoporosis negatively impacts bone in multiple ways beyond the mere loss of bone mass, including compromising skeletal regenerative capacity, architectural deterioration, and bone matrix quality, all of which could diminish implant fixation. Recent findings both in preclinical animal models and in clinical studies indicate encouraging results for the use of osteoporosis drugs to promote implant fixation. Implant fixation in osteoporotic bone presents an increasing clinical challenge that may be benefitted by increased screening and usage of osteoporosis drugs.

Citing Articles

Long-term outcomes of cemented compared to uncemented femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients.

Axenhus M, Chammout G, Kelly-Pettersson P, Mukka S, Magneli M, Skoldenberg O Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025; 51(1):73.

PMID: 39982453 PMC: 11845541. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-024-02735-0.


Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of Kirschner Wire Fixation in Dorsally Displaced Distal Radius Fractures.

Dmour A, Toma S, Cazac A, Tirnovanu S, Dima N, Dmour B Life (Basel). 2025; 14(12.

PMID: 39768391 PMC: 11677149. DOI: 10.3390/life14121684.


Fracture Non-Union in Osteoporotic Bones: Current Practice and Future Directions.

Orji C, Ojo C, Onobun D, Igbokwe K, Khaliq F, Ononye R Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e69778.

PMID: 39429299 PMC: 11491133. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.69778.


Biomechanical evaluation of reinsertion and revision screws in the subaxial cervical vertebrae.

Dong W, Hu Y, Lai O, Yuan Z, Sun X BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):397.

PMID: 38773452 PMC: 11106950. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-07158-3.


Does the proximal humeral bone quality influence alignment after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with short humeral stems?.

Lee H, Kim B, Dan J Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024; 34(4):2137-2145.

PMID: 38557891 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-024-03909-7.


References
1.
Cheung W, Miclau T, Chow S, Yang F, Alt V . Fracture healing in osteoporotic bone. Injury. 2016; 47 Suppl 2:S21-6. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-1383(16)47004-X. View

2.
Miller A, Beyer D, Starring H, Leonardi C, Bronstone A, Dasa V . Importance of Routine Bone Mineral Density Screening Prior to Elective Total Joint Replacement. Orthopedics. 2019; 42(6):310-312. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20191022-01. View

3.
Agholme F, Li X, Isaksson H, Ke H, Aspenberg P . Sclerostin antibody treatment enhances metaphyseal bone healing in rats. J Bone Miner Res. 2010; 25(11):2412-8. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.135. View

4.
Liu Y, Hu J, Liu B, Jiang X, Li Y . The effect of osteoprotegerin on implant osseointegration in ovariectomized rats. Arch Med Sci. 2017; 13(2):489-495. PMC: 5332467. DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2017.65468. View

5.
Li Y, He S, Hua Y, Hu J . Effect of osteoporosis on fixation of osseointegrated implants in rats. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2016; 105(8):2426-2432. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33787. View