» Articles » PMID: 32732945

Red-capped Mangabeys (Cercocebus Torquatus) Adapt Their Interspecific Gestural Communication to the Recipient's Behaviour

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2020 Aug 1
PMID 32732945
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sensitivity to recipient's attention and responsiveness are critical markers of intentional communication. Although previous research showed that ape gestures can be intentional, few studies have yet addressed this question concerning monkeys. Here, we characterise the effect of a recipient's presence, attentional state and responsiveness on the interspecific gestural communication of captive red-capped mangabeys (Cercocebus torquatus). Previous reports showed that they produced learnt begging gestures towards a human recipient preferentially when the latter was facing them. We used here a novel setup that allows subjects to move around an experimenter and to use different modalities (visual and acoustic) to communicate. We found that when the recipient was not facing them, mangabeys moved to a position in the visual field of their recipient rather than using attention-getters. Interestingly, unlike apes, they did not elaborate their communication visually or acoustically when the experimenter did not respond favourably to their begging. However, our results may suggest that begging gestures were goal-directed, since mangabeys inhibited them when the experimenter was not available to answer immediately (i.e. give a reward). Overall, red-capped mangabeys' interspecific visual communication presented intentionality features, but their use of begging gestures was less flexible than that of great apes in similar situations.

Citing Articles

A quick response, but not too much: Experienced mangabeys (Cercocebus torquatus) lose interest in contact call exchanges that do not respect this "conversational rule".

Meunier B, Durier V, Rossard A, Lemasson A PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0310857.

PMID: 39535980 PMC: 11559995. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310857.


Gestural communication in wild spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi).

Villa-Larenas F, Llorente M, Liebal K, Amici F Anim Cogn. 2024; 27(1):18.

PMID: 38429467 PMC: 10907450. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-024-01854-w.


Intentional gestural communication amongst red-capped mangabeys (Cercocebus torquatus).

Schel A, Bono A, Aychet J, Pika S, Lemasson A Anim Cogn. 2022; 25(5):1313-1330.

PMID: 35362785 PMC: 9617956. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-022-01615-7.

References
1.
Hauser M, Chomsky N, Fitch W . The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?. Science. 2002; 298(5598):1569-79. DOI: 10.1126/science.298.5598.1569. View

2.
Leavens D, Russell J, Hopkins W . Intentionality as measured in the persistence and elaboration of communication by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Child Dev. 2005; 76(1):291-306. PMC: 2043155. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00845.x. View

3.
Townsend S, Koski S, Byrne R, Slocombe K, Bickel B, Boeckle M . Exorcising Grice's ghost: an empirical approach to studying intentional communication in animals. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2016; 92(3):1427-1433. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12289. View

4.
Byrne R, Cartmill E, Genty E, Graham K, Hobaiter C, Tanner J . Great ape gestures: intentional communication with a rich set of innate signals. Anim Cogn. 2017; 20(4):755-769. PMC: 5486474. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-017-1096-4. View

5.
Tomasello M, Call J . Thirty years of great ape gestures. Anim Cogn. 2018; 22(4):461-469. PMC: 6647417. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-018-1167-1. View