» Articles » PMID: 32732094

Standard Operating Procedure of Image-guided Intervention During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Combined Tertiary Musculoskeletal Oncology Centre Experience

Overview
Journal Clin Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2020 Aug 1
PMID 32732094
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the response measures in continuing an image-guided intervention service in two tertiary-level musculoskeletal oncology centres during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Materials And Methods: This study was a retrospective review of all patients undergoing image-guided intervention in the computed tomography (CT) and normal ultrasound (US) rooms from 24 March 2020 to 24 May 2020 (during the COVID-19 pandemic peak) at Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London, and Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK. Measures were put in place to address air pressures, airflow direction, aerosol generation, and the safe utilisation of existing scanning rooms and work lists for interventional procedures.

Results: Three hundred and thirty-one patients (164 at Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital and 167 at Royal Orthopaedic Hospital) underwent image-guided procedures at both sites in the CT and US rooms. At the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, 40% of all procedures were performed under general anaesthesia. These consisted of 47 CT biopsies, 7 CT radiofrequency ablations (RFAs), and 12 US biopsies. At the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, 86% of all procedures were performed under local anaesthetic, with no general anaesthetic procedures. These consisted of 61 CT biopsies and 83 US biopsies. All 256 patients having procedures in the CT room had no post-procedural complications or COVID-19-related symptoms and morbidity on follow-up.

Conclusion: By adopting a pragmatic approach with meticulous planning, a limited, but fully functional image-guided interventional list can be run without any adverse patient outcomes.

Citing Articles

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on interventional radiology services across the world.

Xu Y, Mandal I, Lam S, Troumpoukis N, Uberoi R, Sabharwal T Clin Radiol. 2021; 76(8):621-625.

PMID: 34090708 PMC: 8133525. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2021.05.001.

References
1.
Fu Shaw L, Chen I, Chen C, Wu H, Lai L, Chen Y . Factors influencing microbial colonies in the air of operating rooms. BMC Infect Dis. 2018; 18(1):4. PMC: 5749012. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-017-2928-1. View

2.
Watson J, Whiting P, Brush J . Interpreting a covid-19 test result. BMJ. 2020; 369:m1808. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m1808. View

3.
Chow T, Kwan A, Lin Z, Bai W . Conversion of operating theatre from positive to negative pressure environment. J Hosp Infect. 2006; 64(4):371-8. PMC: 7114868. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.07.020. View

4.
Khoo M, Pressney I, Hargunani R, Saifuddin A . Small, superficial, indeterminate soft-tissue lesions as suspected sarcomas: is primary excision biopsy suitable?. Skeletal Radiol. 2017; 46(7):919-924. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-017-2635-4. View

5.
van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris D, Holbrook M, Gamble A, Williamson B . Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(16):1564-1567. PMC: 7121658. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2004973. View