» Articles » PMID: 32731835

Total Elbow Arthroplasty in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Overview
Journal Bone Joint J
Date 2020 Aug 1
PMID 32731835
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: The aims of this study were to validate the outcome of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to identify factors that affect the outcome.

Methods: We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Reviews, and Embase from between January 2003 and March 2019. The primary aim was to determine the implant failure rate, the mode of failure, and risk factors predisposing to failure. A secondary aim was to identify the overall complication rate, associated risk factors, and clinical performance. A meta-regression analysis was completed to identify the association between each parameter with the outcome.

Results: A total of 38 studies including 2,118 TEAs were included in the study. The mean follow-up was 80.9 months (8.2 to 156). The implant failure and complication rates were 16.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.128 to 0.200) and 24.5% (95% CI 0.203 to 0.293), respectively. Aseptic loosening was the most common mode of failure (9.5%; 95% CI 0.071 to 0.124). The mean postoperative ranges of motion (ROMs) were: flexion 131.5° (124.2° to 138.8°), extension 29.3° (26.8° to 31.9°), pronation 74.0° (67.8° to 80.2°), and supination 72.5° (69.5° to 75.5°), and the mean postoperative Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was 89.3 (95% CI 86.9 to 91.6). The meta-regression analysis identified that younger patients and implants with an unlinked design correlated with higher failure rates. Younger patients were associated with increased complications, while female patients and an unlinked prosthesis were associated with aseptic loosening.

Conclusion: TEA continues to provide satisfactory results for patients with RA. However, it is associated with a substantially higher implant failure and complication rates compared with hip and knee arthroplasties. The patient's age, sex, and whether cemented fixation and unlinked prosthesis were used can influence the outcome. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. Cite this article: 2020;102-B(8):967-980.

Citing Articles

Is popularity of total elbow arthroplasty in the United States decreasing? An analysis of trends, demographics, and indications.

McKissack H, Karzon A, Hussain Z, Worden J, Heo K, Cooke H JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2024; 4(4):797-804.

PMID: 39474197 PMC: 11514080. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.03.005.


Prognostic factors associated with failure of total elbow arthroplasty.

Hamoodi Z, Gehringer C, Bull L, Hughes T, Kearsley-Fleet L, Sergeant J Bone Joint Res. 2024; 13(5):201-213.

PMID: 38688503 PMC: 11060869. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.135.BJR-2023-0281.R1.


Prognostic factors associated with failure of total elbow replacement: a protocol for a systematic review.

Hamoodi Z, Gehringer C, Bull L, Hughes T, Kearsley-Fleet L, Sergeant J BMJ Open. 2023; 13(8):e071705.

PMID: 37648384 PMC: 10471856. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071705.


Comparison of baseline demographics and risk factors for aseptic loosening following primary total elbow arthroplasty.

Prior H, Jamil Z, Rodriguez A, Swiggett S, Weisberg M, Razi A Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023; 33(7):3153-3158.

PMID: 37061573 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-023-03550-w.


Implant survival of total elbow arthroplasty: analysis of 514 cases from the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry.

Macken A, Prkic A, van Oost I, Spekenbrink-Spooren A, The B, Eygendaal D Bone Jt Open. 2023; 4(2):110-119.

PMID: 37051858 PMC: 9999123. DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.42.BJO-2022-0152.R1.


References
1.
Hanninen P, Niinimaki T, Flinkkila T, Niinimaki J, Ohtonen P, Yli-Luukko S . Discovery Elbow System: clinical and radiological results after 2- to 10-year follow-up. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017; 27(7):901-907. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-017-1954-4. View

2.
Forster M, Clark D, Lunn P . Elbow osteoarthritis: prognostic indicators in ulnohumeral debridement--the Outerbridge-Kashiwagi procedure. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001; 10(6):557-60. DOI: 10.1067/mse.2001.118416. View

3.
Watkins C, Elson D, Harrison J, Pooley J . Long-term results of the lateral resurfacing elbow arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2018; 100-B(3):338-345. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B3.BJJ-2017-0865.R1. View

4.
Nishida K, Hashizume K, Nakahara R, Ozawa M, Harada R, Machida T . Short-term results of the PROSNAP linked elbow prosthesis with a snap-in structure and modular flange for the reconstruction of severely damaged rheumatoid elbows. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23(6):837-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.12.031. View

5.
Welsink C, Lambers K, van Deurzen D, Eygendaal D, van den Bekerom M . Total Elbow Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. JBJS Rev. 2017; 5(7):e4. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.16.00089. View