» Articles » PMID: 32724922

Zirconia Implants and Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2020 Jul 30
PMID 32724922
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to provide sufficient information on the clinical outcome of zirconia implants, mainly observing the survival rate and marginal bone loss (MBL), with a minimum follow-up of 12 months, to verify the adoption of ceramics as a rational possibility for dental implants.

Materials And Methods: A systematic electronic search through the PubMed (MEDLINE) and EMBASE databases was performed by two independent reviewers to identify clinical studies published between January 2005 and April 2019 containing a minimum of 10 patients per study and 12 months of follow-up after functional loading. References from the selected articles were manually reviewed for further studies.

Results: From the initial 1,225 articles retrieved, 19 met all the inclusion criteria. The marginal bone remodeling accounted for mean losses of 0.8 mm (95% CI: 0.60 to 1.00 mm) and 1.01 mm (95% CI: 0.72 to 1.29 mm) at 1 year and 2 years postloading, respectively. The failure rate of 6.8% was calculated for a mean follow-up period of 2.75 years, where the prevalence of early failure, late failure, and implant fracture was 3.4%, 1.7%, and 1.7%, respectively. The meta-analysis associated with the survival rate of one- and two-piece zirconia dental implants was hindered due to the lack of confidence interval or standard deviation information in most of the included articles.

Conclusion: Zirconia implants presented MBL values consistent with the standard in the global consensus, high survival rates, and considerable clinical results at short-term observation periods following prosthetic delivery.

Citing Articles

Novel digital technique for measuring the volumetric healing process of free gingival grafts surrounding dental implants.

Docampo-Vazquez C, Gragera-Alia T, Fernandez-Dominguez M, Zubizarreta-Macho A, Aragoneses-Lamas J Front Dent Med. 2025; 5:1372312.

PMID: 39917676 PMC: 11797868. DOI: 10.3389/fdmed.2024.1372312.


The effect of occlusal balance and prosthesis on occlusal function of patients after dental implant restoration.

Zhang Y, Zhang B Heliyon. 2025; 11(2):e41732.

PMID: 39877616 PMC: 11773015. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41732.


Comparison of Microbiota in Zirconia and Titanium Implants: A Qualitative Systematic Review.

Bonyadi Manesh M, Vatankhah N, Bonyadi Manesh F Int Dent J. 2024; 75(1):51-58.

PMID: 39237398 PMC: 11806319. DOI: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.08.001.


Comparative Clinical Behavior of Zirconia versus Titanium Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Morena D, Leitao-Almeida B, Pereira M, Resende R, Fernandes J, Fernandes G J Clin Med. 2024; 13(15).

PMID: 39124755 PMC: 11313197. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13154488.


Beyond microroughness: novel approaches to navigate osteoblast activity on implant surfaces.

Matsuura T, Komatsu K, Cheng J, Park G, Ogawa T Int J Implant Dent. 2024; 10(1):35.

PMID: 38967690 PMC: 11226592. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-024-00554-x.