» Articles » PMID: 32723791

Microbiome and Metagenome Analyses of a Closed Habitat During Human Occupation

Overview
Journal mSystems
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2020 Jul 30
PMID 32723791
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Microbial contamination during long-term confinements of space exploration presents potential risks for both crew members and spacecraft life support systems. A novel swab kit was used to sample various surfaces from a submerged, closed, analog habitat to characterize the microbial populations. Samples were collected from various locations across the habitat which were constructed from various surface materials (linoleum, dry wall, particle board, glass, and metal), and microbial populations were examined by culture, quantitative PCR (qPCR), microbiome 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and shotgun metagenomics. Propidium monoazide (PMA)-treated samples identified the viable/intact microbial population of the habitat. The cultivable microbial population ranged from below the detection limit to 10 CFU/sample, and their identity was characterized using Sanger sequencing. Both 16S rRNA amplicon and shotgun sequencing were used to characterize the microbial dynamics, community profiles, and functional attributes (metabolism, virulence, and antimicrobial resistance). The 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing revealed abundance of viable (after PMA treatment) (, , , , and ), (, , and ), and (especially ) on linoleum, dry wall, and particle board (LDP) surfaces, while members of () and () were high on the glass/metal surfaces. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling determined from both 16S rRNA and metagenomic analyses revealed differential microbial species on LDP surfaces and glass/metal surfaces. The shotgun metagenomic sequencing of samples after PMA treatment showed bacterial predominance of viable (53.6%), (7.8%), (9.9%), (3.7%), and (2.1%), while fungal analyses revealed and dominance. This study provides the first assessment of monitoring cultivable and viable microorganisms on surfaces within a submerged, closed, analog habitat. The results of the analyses presented herein suggest that the surface material plays a role in microbial community structure, as the microbial populations differed between LDP and metal/glass surfaces. The metal/glass surfaces had less-complex community, lower bioburden, and more closely resembled the controls. These results indicated that material choice is crucial when building closed habitats, even if they are simply analogs. Finally, while a few species were associated with previously cultivated isolates from the International Space Station and MIR spacecraft, the majority of the microbial ecology of the submerged analog habitat differs greatly from that of previously studied analog habitats.

Citing Articles

Biochar for ameliorating soil fertility and microbial diversity: From production to action of the black gold.

Ighalo J, Ohoro C, Ojukwu V, Oniye M, Shaikh W, Biswas J iScience. 2025; 28(1):111524.

PMID: 39807171 PMC: 11728978. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111524.


Microbiome and virome on indoor surfaces of an Antarctic research ship.

Prado T, Magalhaes M, Moreira D, Brandao M, Fumian T, Ferreira F Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2023; 118:e230084.

PMID: 37672426 PMC: 10481937. DOI: 10.1590/0074-02760230084.


Understanding the Complexities and Changes of the Astronaut Microbiome for Successful Long-Duration Space Missions.

Tesei D, Jewczynko A, Lynch A, Urbaniak C Life (Basel). 2022; 12(4).

PMID: 35454986 PMC: 9031868. DOI: 10.3390/life12040495.


Microbiomes of air dust collected during the ground-based closed bioregenerative life support experiment "Lunar Palace 365".

Yang J, Fu Y, Liu H Environ Microbiome. 2022; 17(1):4.

PMID: 35081988 PMC: 8793263. DOI: 10.1186/s40793-022-00399-0.


A Metatranscriptomics Survey of Microbial Diversity on Surfaces Post-Intervention of cleanSURFACES® Technology in an Intensive Care Unit.

Chen See J, Ly T, Shope A, Bess J, Wall A, Komanduri S Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021; 11:705593.

PMID: 34354962 PMC: 8330600. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.705593.

References
1.
Otto M . Staphylococcus colonization of the skin and antimicrobial peptides. Expert Rev Dermatol. 2010; 5(2):183-195. PMC: 2867359. DOI: 10.1586/edm.10.6. View

2.
Vieites J, Guazzaroni M, Beloqui A, Golyshin P, Ferrer M . Metagenomics approaches in systems microbiology. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2008; 33(1):236-55. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00152.x. View

3.
Vaishampayan P, Probst A, La Duc M, Bargoma E, Benardini J, Andersen G . New perspectives on viable microbial communities in low-biomass cleanroom environments. ISME J. 2012; 7(2):312-24. PMC: 3554398. DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2012.114. View

4.
Van Houdt R, De Boever P, Coninx I, Le Calvez C, Dicasillati R, Mahillon J . Evaluation of the airborne bacterial population in the periodically confined Antarctic base Concordia. Microb Ecol. 2008; 57(4):640-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00248-008-9462-z. View

5.
Alekhova T, Aleksandrova A, Novozhilova T, Lysak L, Zagustina N, Bezborodov A . [Monitoring of microbial degraders in manned space stations]. Prikl Biokhim Mikrobiol. 2005; 41(4):435-43. View