Comparing the Rule of 5 to Trend-based Analysis for Detecting Glaucoma Progression on OCT
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: The rule of 5 is a simple rule for detecting retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) change on spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT), in which a loss of 5 μm of global RNFL on a follow-up test is considered evidence of significant change when compared with the baseline. The rule is based on short-term test-retest variability of SD-OCT and is often used in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to compare the rule of 5 with trend-based analysis of global RNFL thickness over time for detecting glaucomatous progression.
Design: Prospective cohort.
Participants: A total of 300 eyes of 210 glaucoma subjects followed for an average of 5.4±1.5 years with a median of 11 (interquartile range, 7-14) visits.
Methods: Trend-based analysis was performed by ordinary least-squares (OLS) linear regression of global RNFL thickness over time. For estimation of specificity, false-positives were obtained by assessing for progression on series of randomly permutated follow-up visits for each eye, which removes any systematic trend over time. The specificity of trend-based analysis was matched to that of the rule of 5 to allow meaningful comparison of the "hit rate," or the proportion of glaucoma eyes categorized as progressing at each time point, using the original sequence of visits.
Main Outcome Measures: Comparison between hit rates of trend-analysis versus rule of 5 at matched specificity.
Results: After 5 years, the simple rule of 5 identified 37.5% of eyes as progressing at a specificity of 81.1%. At the same specificity, the hit rate for trend-based analysis was significantly greater than that of the rule of 5 (62.9% vs. 37.5%; P < 0.001). If the rule of 5 was required to be repeatable on a consecutive test, specificity improved to 93.4%, but hit rate decreased to 21.0%. At this higher specificity, trend-based analysis still had a significantly greater hit rate than the rule of 5 (47.4% vs. 21.0%, respectively; P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Trend-based analysis was superior to the simple rule of 5 for identifying progression in glaucoma eyes and should be preferred as a method for longitudinal assessment of global SD-OCT RNFL change over time.
Su B, Weiss R, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Holbrook A Ann Appl Stat. 2025; 18(4):3444-3466.
PMID: 40017564 PMC: 11864210. DOI: 10.1214/24-aoas1944.
Thompson A, Falconi A, Sappington R Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2024; 2:937205.
PMID: 38983522 PMC: 11182271. DOI: 10.3389/fopht.2022.937205.
Clinical risk stratification in glaucoma.
Poostchi A, Kastner A, Konstantakopoulou E, Gazzard G, Jayaram H Eye (Lond). 2023; 37(15):3121-3127.
PMID: 36918628 PMC: 10013986. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-023-02480-5.
Tong J, Alonso-Caneiro D, Kalloniatis M, Zangerl B Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022; 42(5):948-964.
PMID: 35598146 PMC: 9544890. DOI: 10.1111/opo.12997.