» Articles » PMID: 32722118

Metabolic Modelling As a Framework for Metabolomics Data Integration and Analysis

Overview
Journal Metabolites
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Jul 30
PMID 32722118
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Metabolic networks are regulated to ensure the dynamic adaptation of biochemical reaction fluxes to maintain cell homeostasis and optimal metabolic fitness in response to endogenous and exogenous perturbations. To this end, metabolism is tightly controlled by dynamic and intricate regulatory mechanisms involving allostery, enzyme abundance and post-translational modifications. The study of the molecular entities involved in these complex mechanisms has been boosted by the advent of high-throughput technologies. The so-called omics enable the quantification of the different molecular entities at different system layers, connecting the genotype with the phenotype. Therefore, the study of the overall behavior of a metabolic network and the omics data integration and analysis must be approached from a holistic perspective. Due to the close relationship between metabolism and cellular phenotype, metabolic modelling has emerged as a valuable tool to decipher the underlying mechanisms governing cell phenotype. Constraint-based modelling and kinetic modelling are among the most widely used methods to study cell metabolism at different scales, ranging from cells to tissues and organisms. These approaches enable integrating metabolomic data, among others, to enhance model predictive capabilities. In this review, we describe the current state of the art in metabolic modelling and discuss future perspectives and current challenges in the field.

Citing Articles

A Guide to Metabolic Network Modeling for Plant Biology.

Rao X, Liu W Plants (Basel). 2025; 14(3).

PMID: 39943046 PMC: 11820892. DOI: 10.3390/plants14030484.


MetaPhenotype: A Transferable Meta-Learning Model for Single-Cell Mass Spectrometry-Based Cell Phenotype Prediction Using Limited Number of Cells.

Yao S, Nguyen T, Lan Y, Yang W, Chen D, Shao Y Anal Chem. 2024; 96(49):19238-19247.

PMID: 39570119 PMC: 11673283. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c02038.


Burden Imposed by Heterologous Protein Production in Two Major Industrial Yeast Cell Factories: Identifying Sources and Mitigation Strategies.

Kastberg L, Ard R, Jensen M, Workman C Front Fungal Biol. 2023; 3:827704.

PMID: 37746199 PMC: 10512257. DOI: 10.3389/ffunb.2022.827704.


Towards advanced bioprocess optimization: A multiscale modelling approach.

Monteiro M, Fadda S, Kontoravdi C Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2023; 21:3639-3655.

PMID: 37520284 PMC: 10371800. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.07.003.


Monitoring and modelling the glutamine metabolic pathway: a review and future perspectives.

Mirveis Z, Howe O, Cahill P, Patil N, Byrne H Metabolomics. 2023; 19(8):67.

PMID: 37482587 PMC: 10363518. DOI: 10.1007/s11306-023-02031-9.


References
1.
Strutz J, Martin J, Greene J, Broadbelt L, Tyo K . Metabolic kinetic modeling provides insight into complex biological questions, but hurdles remain. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2019; 59:24-30. PMC: 6731160. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2019.02.005. View

2.
Gopalakrishnan S, Dash S, Maranas C . K-FIT: An accelerated kinetic parameterization algorithm using steady-state fluxomic data. Metab Eng. 2020; 61:197-205. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2020.03.001. View

3.
Heinken A, Sahoo S, Fleming R, Thiele I . Systems-level characterization of a host-microbe metabolic symbiosis in the mammalian gut. Gut Microbes. 2012; 4(1):28-40. PMC: 3555882. DOI: 10.4161/gmic.22370. View

4.
Long C, Antoniewicz M . High-resolution C metabolic flux analysis. Nat Protoc. 2019; 14(10):2856-2877. DOI: 10.1038/s41596-019-0204-0. View

5.
Luo R, Liao S, Tao G, Li Y, Zeng S, Li Y . Dynamic analysis of optimality in myocardial energy metabolism under normal and ischemic conditions. Mol Syst Biol. 2006; 2:2006.0031. PMC: 1681503. DOI: 10.1038/msb4100071. View