» Articles » PMID: 32720898

A Web-Based Intervention to Prevent Multiple Chronic Disease Risk Factors Among Adolescents: Co-Design and User Testing of the Health4Life School-Based Program

Abstract

Background: Chronic diseases are the leading cause of death worldwide. Addressing key lifestyle risk factors during adolescence is critical for improving physical and mental health outcomes and reducing chronic disease risk. Schools are ideal intervention settings, and electronic health (eHealth) interventions afford several advantages, including increased student engagement, scalability, and sustainability. Although lifestyle risk behaviors tend to co-occur, few school-based eHealth interventions have targeted multiple behaviors concurrently.

Objective: This study aims to summarize the co-design and user testing of the Health4Life school-based program, a web-based cartoon intervention developed to concurrently prevent 6 key lifestyle risk factors for chronic disease among secondary school students: alcohol use, smoking, poor diet, physical inactivity, sedentary recreational screen time, and poor sleep (the Big 6).

Methods: The development of the Health4Life program was conducted over 18 months in collaboration with students, teachers, and researchers with expertise relevant to the Big 6. The iterative process involved (1) scoping of evidence and systematic literature review; (2) consultation with adolescents (N=815) via a cross-sectional web-based survey to identify knowledge gaps, attitudes, barriers, and facilitators in relation to the Big 6; (3) content and web development; and (4) user testing of the web-based program with students (n=41) and teachers (n=8) to evaluate its acceptability, relevance, and appeal to the target audience.

Results: The co-design process resulted in a six-module, evidence-informed program that uses interactive cartoon storylines and web-based delivery to engage students. Student and teacher feedback collected during user testing was positive in terms of acceptability and relevance. Commonly identified areas for improvement concerned the length of modules, age appropriateness of language and alcohol storyline, the need for character backstories and links to syllabus information, and feasibility of implementation. Modifications were made to address these issues.

Conclusions: The Health4Life school-based program is the first universal, web-based program to concurrently address 6 important chronic disease risk factors among secondary school students. By adopting a multiple health behavior change approach, it has the potential to efficiently modify the Big 6 risk factors within one program and to equip young people with the skills and knowledge needed to achieve and maintain good physical and mental health throughout adolescence and into adulthood.

Citing Articles

Digital behavioral dietary interventions to promote a healthy diet among children and adolescents: a scoping review of technologies, design, behavioral theory, and assessed outcomes.

van der Heijden Z, Lucassen D, Faessen J, Camps G, Lu Y, Schipper H Health Psychol Behav Med. 2024; 12(1):2430965.

PMID: 39624785 PMC: 11610228. DOI: 10.1080/21642850.2024.2430965.


Process evaluation of the digital Health4Life intervention among a sample of disadvantaged adolescents and teachers.

Egan L, Gardner L, Newton N, Champion K Health Promot Int. 2024; 39(6).

PMID: 39612512 PMC: 11606168. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daae170.


Adolescent behavioural intentions: Secondary outcomes from a cluster randomized controlled trial of the Health4Life school-based lifestyle modification intervention.

ODean S, Smout S, Sunderland M, Slade T, Gardner L, Chapman C Can J Public Health. 2024; .

PMID: 39562470 DOI: 10.17269/s41997-024-00955-w.


The Triple E project: a factorial randomised controlled trial to enhance engagement with eHealth approaches to improve health risk behaviours among adolescents.

Thornton L, Corliss C, Deen H, Teesson M, Champion K, Partridge S BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2697.

PMID: 39363157 PMC: 11448254. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20124-5.


Moderating effects of socioeconomic status and geographical location on the Health4Life school-based intervention.

Egan L, Gardner L, Newton N, ODean S, Champion K Prev Med Rep. 2024; 46:102855.

PMID: 39247204 PMC: 11378973. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102855.


References
1.
Mata J, Silva M, Vieira P, Carraca E, Andrade A, Coutinho S . Motivational "spill-over" during weight control: increased self-determination and exercise intrinsic motivation predict eating self-regulation. Health Psychol. 2009; 28(6):709-16. DOI: 10.1037/a0016764. View

2.
Spring B, Moller A, Coons M . Multiple health behaviours: overview and implications. J Public Health (Oxf). 2012; 34 Suppl 1:i3-10. PMC: 3284863. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr111. View

3.
de la Haye K, DAmico E, Miles J, Ewing B, Tucker J . Covariance among multiple health risk behaviors in adolescents. PLoS One. 2014; 9(5):e98141. PMC: 4032285. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098141. View

4.
Nguyen B, Ding D, Mihrshahi S . Fruit and vegetable consumption and psychological distress: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses based on a large Australian sample. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(3):e014201. PMC: 5353310. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014201. View

5.
Miller-Day M, Pettigrew J, Hecht M, Shin Y, Graham J, Krieger J . How prevention curricula are taught under real-world conditions: Types of and reasons for teacher curriculum adaptations. Health Educ (Lond). 2015; 113(4):324-344. PMC: 4539007. DOI: 10.1108/09654281311329259. View