» Articles » PMID: 32719193

Clinical Outcomes of Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction-intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection with Fresh or Cryopreserved Sperm in Patients with Nonobstructive Azoospermia

Overview
Journal Asian J Androl
Specialty Urology
Date 2020 Jul 29
PMID 32719193
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We performed this study to evaluate the clinical outcomes of microdissection testicular sperm extraction-intracytoplasmic sperm injection (micro-TESE-ICSI) treatment that used fresh or cryopreserved sperm in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA). A total of 338 NOA patients with 344 consecutive cycles received treatment in the reproductive medicine center of Peking University Third Hospital in Beijing, China, from January 2014 to December 2017. Fresh oocytes and fresh sperm were used in 222 patients with 234 cycles (Group A). Fresh oocytes and cryopreserved sperm were used in 116 patients with 110 cycles (Group B). We compared patient characteristics, embryonic development, and pregnancy outcomes between Groups A and B. There was no statistical difference in the patient characteristics, and no differences were observed with fertilization or quality embryo rates between Groups A and B. The rates of clinical pregnancy and live birth were both higher for Group A than those for Group B (both P < 0.05). In conclusion, fresh testicular sperm appears to produce better ICSI outcomes than cryopreserved testicular sperm in patients with NOA.

Citing Articles

Critical appraisal of 'pregnancy outcomes in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia undergoing micro-TESE: comparison of fresh vs. frozen-thawed testicular sperm'.

Elzeiny H J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025; .

PMID: 39976775 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-025-03419-3.


Revisiting non-obstructive azoospermia: Is there a best way to retrieve testicular sperm?.

Kanto S, Ichioka K, Sato Y, Uchino Y, Tanaka T, Endo M Reprod Med Biol. 2025; 24(1):e12632.

PMID: 39917553 PMC: 11799768. DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12632.


Effect of freezing and thawing on ejaculated sperm and subsequent pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in IVF.

Xie Q, Jiang X, Zhao M, Xie Y, Fan Y, Suo L Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1408662.

PMID: 39736859 PMC: 11684094. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1408662.


Pregnancy outcomes in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia undergoing micro-TESE: comparison of fresh vs. frozen-thawed testicular sperm.

Suleymanova L, Bayram H, Donmez Cakil Y, Selam B, Cincik M J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(12):3399-3404.

PMID: 39432191 PMC: 11707213. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03291-7.


Comparison of obstetrical and neonatal outcomes between fresh versus frozen-thawed testicular sperm derived from microTESE.

Nagawkar Perlov S, Deri N, Eldar-Geva T, Gal M, Reichman O, Or Y J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(10):2681-2690.

PMID: 39331312 PMC: 11535137. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03265-9.


References
1.
Forman E, Li X, Ferry K, Scott K, Treff N, Scott Jr R . Oocyte vitrification does not increase the risk of embryonic aneuploidy or diminish the implantation potential of blastocysts created after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a novel, paired randomized controlled trial using DNA fingerprinting. Fertil Steril. 2012; 98(3):644-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.04.028. View

2.
CHANDLEY A . The chromosomal basis of human infertility. Br Med Bull. 1979; 35(2):181-6. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a071567. View

3.
Chian R, Huang J, Tan S, Lucena E, Saa A, Rojas A . Obstetric and perinatal outcome in 200 infants conceived from vitrified oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008; 16(5):608-10. DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60471-3. View

4.
Gottardo F, Kliesch S . [Semen analysis: spermiogram according to WHO 2010 criteria]. Urologe A. 2010; 50(1):101-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00120-010-2466-6. View

5.
Hauser R, Bibi G, Yogev L, Carmon A, Azem F, Botchan A . Virtual azoospermia and cryptozoospermia--fresh/frozen testicular or ejaculate sperm for better IVF outcome?. J Androl. 2010; 32(5):484-90. DOI: 10.2164/jandrol.110.011353. View