Conformational and Model-building Studies of the Hairpin Form of the Mismatched DNA Octamer D(m5C-G-m5C-G-T-G-m5C-G)
Overview
Molecular Biology
Authors
Affiliations
The hairpin form of the mismatched octamer d(m5C-G-m5C-G-T-G-m5C-G) was studied by means of NMR spectroscopy. In a companion study it is shown that the hairpin form of this DNA fragment consists of a structure with a stem of three Watson-Crick-type base pairs and a loop consisting of only two nucleotides. The non-exchangeable proton resonances were assigned by means of two-dimensional correlation spectroscopy and two-dimensional nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy. Proton-proton coupling constants were used for the conformational analysis of the deoxyribose ring and for some of the backbone torsion angles. From the two-dimensional NMR spectra and the coupling-constant analysis it is concluded that: (i) the stem of the hairpin exhibits B-DNA characteristics; (ii) the sugar rings are not conformationally pure, but display a certain amount of conformational flexibility; (iii) the stacking interaction in the stem of the hairpin is elongated from the 3'-side in a more or less regular fashion with the two loop nucleotides; (iv) at the 5'-side of the stem a stacking discontinuity occurs between the stem and the loop; (v) at the 5'-side of the stem the loop is closed by means of a sharp backbone turn which involves unusual gamma' and beta+ torsion angles in residue dG(6). The NMR results led to the construction of a hairpin-loop model which was energy-minimized by means of a molecular-mechanics program. The results clearly show that a DNA hairpin-loop structure in which the loop consists of only two nucleotides bridging the minor groove in a straightforward fashion, (i) causes no undue steric strain, and (ii) involves well-known conformational principles throughout the course of the backbone. The hairpin form of the title compound is compared with the hairpin form of d(A-T-C-C-T-A-T4-T-A-G-G-A-T), in which the central -T4- part forms a loop of four nucleotides. Both models display similarities as far as stacking interactions are concerned.
Ippel J, Lanzotti V, Galeone A, Mayol L, van den Boogaart J, Pikkemaat J J Biomol NMR. 1995; 6(4):403-22.
PMID: 8563468 DOI: 10.1007/BF00197639.
Avizonis D, Kearns D Nucleic Acids Res. 1995; 23(7):1260-8.
PMID: 7739905 PMC: 306840. DOI: 10.1093/nar/23.7.1260.
Durand M, Chevrie K, Chassignol M, Thuong N, Maurizot J Nucleic Acids Res. 1990; 18(21):6353-9.
PMID: 2243780 PMC: 332506. DOI: 10.1093/nar/18.21.6353.
Boulard Y, Gabarro-Arpa J, Cognet J, Le Bret M, Guy A, Teoule R Nucleic Acids Res. 1991; 19(19):5159-67.
PMID: 1923802 PMC: 328870. DOI: 10.1093/nar/19.19.5159.
Rinkel L, Tinoco Jr I Nucleic Acids Res. 1991; 19(13):3695-700.
PMID: 1852611 PMC: 328400. DOI: 10.1093/nar/19.13.3695.