» Articles » PMID: 32704547

Sweet Taste Does Not Modulate Pain Perception in Adult Humans

Overview
Date 2020 Aug 15
PMID 32704547
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: Sugar is routinely used to comfort neonates undergoing painful procedures, and animal studies have shown that sucrose increases the time to withdrawal from painful stimuli. However, there are no published studies examining the effects of sweet substances on heat pain thresholds and percept in adult humans. : Healthy adult volunteers (n=27, aged 18-48 years) were recruited to a controlled, double-blind, randomised, cross-over study to characterise the effect of tasting solutions of equivalent sweetness (10% sucrose and 0.016% sucralose) on warm detection and heat pain thresholds and the percept ratings of painfully hot stimuli. The effect of anticipation of a sweet taste on heat pain threshold was also assessed. : Tasting either sucrose or sucralose had no significant effect on the percept of an individually titrated hot stimulus (54.5±4.2 and 54.9±3.2 vs 53.2±3.5 for water, 0-100 visual analogue scale), on the warm detection or heat pain threshold (43.3±0.8, 43.2±0.8 vs 43.0±0.8°C). Anticipation of a sweet substance similarly did not affect heat pain thresholds. : Sucrose and sucralose solutions had no analgesic effect when assessed using heat detection thresholds and percept ratings of painfully hot stimuli despite being perceived as sweeter and more pleasant than water. These findings are in contrast to results reported from previous animal studies in which thermal analgesia from sweet solutions is robust. Given the ubiquitous availability of sugar rich drinks in the modern environment, the lack of observable effect may be due to an insufficient hedonic value of the test solutions when compared to the experience of a laboratory rodent. Alternatively, sweet tastes may have a specific effect on pain tolerance rather than the threshold and acute percept measures assayed in this study.

Citing Articles

Shifting the Balance: How Top-Down and Bottom-Up Input Modulate Pain the Rostral Ventromedial Medulla.

Chen Q, Heinricher M Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2022; 3:932476.

PMID: 35836737 PMC: 9274196. DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2022.932476.


Tasting temperature: neural and behavioral responses to thermal stimulation of oral mucosa.

Lemon C Curr Opin Physiol. 2021; 20:16-22.

PMID: 33937598 PMC: 8081375. DOI: 10.1016/j.cophys.2020.12.005.


Pain, Smell, and Taste in Adults: A Narrative Review of Multisensory Perception and Interaction.

Sandri A, Cecchini M, Riello M, Zanini A, Nocini R, Fiorio M Pain Ther. 2021; 10(1):245-268.

PMID: 33635507 PMC: 8119564. DOI: 10.1007/s40122-021-00247-y.

References
1.
MERCER M, Holder M . Antinociceptive effects of palatable sweet ingesta on human responsivity to pressure pain. Physiol Behav. 1997; 61(2):311-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(96)00400-3. View

2.
Foo H, Mason P . Ingestion analgesia occurs when a bad taste turns good. Behav Neurosci. 2011; 125(6):956-61. PMC: 3226930. DOI: 10.1037/a0025542. View

3.
Minkley N, Schroder T, Wolf O, Kirchner W . The socially evaluated cold-pressor test (SECPT) for groups: effects of repeated administration of a combined physiological and psychological stressor. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2014; 45:119-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.03.022. View

4.
de Freitas R, Kubler J, Elias-Filho D, Coimbra N . Antinociception induced by acute oral administration of sweet substance in young and adult rodents: the role of endogenous opioid peptides chemical mediators and μ(1)-opioid receptors. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2011; 101(2):265-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2011.12.005. View

5.
Brooks J, Davies W, Pickering A . Resolving the Brainstem Contributions to Attentional Analgesia. J Neurosci. 2017; 37(9):2279-2291. PMC: 5354342. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2193-16.2016. View