» Articles » PMID: 32702976

Quantitative Characterization of Uncertainty in the Concentration-Response Relationship Between Long-Term PM Exposure and Mortality at Low Concentrations

Overview
Date 2020 Jul 25
PMID 32702976
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Extensive epidemiologic evidence supports a linear, no-threshold concentration-response (C-R) relationship between long-term exposure to fine particles (PM) and mortality in the United States. While examinations of the C-R relationship are designed to assess the shape of the C-R curve, they do not provide the information needed to quantitatively characterize uncertainty at specific PM concentrations, which is often needed in the context of risk assessments and benefits analyses. We developed a novel approach, using information that is typically available in published epidemiologic studies, to quantitatively characterize uncertainty at different concentrations along the PM concentration distribution. Our approach utilizes the annual mean PM concentration and corresponding standard deviation from a published epidemiologic study to estimate the standard deviation of hypothetical PM concentration distributions defined at 0.1 μg/m increments. The hypothetical distributions are then used to derive adjusted uncertainty estimates in the reported effect estimate at low concentrations (i.e., concentrations lower than the annual mean observed in the study). We demonstrate the application of this method in six individual epidemiologic studies that examined the relationship between long-term PM exposure and mortality and were conducted in different geographic locations worldwide and at different PM concentrations. This new method allows for a more comprehensive quantitative evaluation of uncertainty in the shape of the C-R relationship between long-term PM exposure and mortality at concentrations below the mean annual concentrations observed in current studies.

Citing Articles

Uncertainty Reduction and Environmental Justice in Air Pollution Epidemiology: The Importance of Minority Representation.

Alifa M, Castruccio S, Bolster D, Bravo M, Crippa P Geohealth. 2023; 7(10):e2023GH000854.

PMID: 37780098 PMC: 10538591. DOI: 10.1029/2023GH000854.


Global, high-resolution, reduced-complexity air quality modeling for PM2.5 using InMAP (Intervention Model for Air Pollution).

Thakrar S, Tessum C, Apte J, Balasubramanian S, Millet D, Pandis S PLoS One. 2022; 17(5):e0268714.

PMID: 35613109 PMC: 9132322. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268714.

References
1.
Liao X, Zucker D, Li Y, Spiegelman D . Survival analysis with error-prone time-varying covariates: a risk set calibration approach. Biometrics. 2010; 67(1):50-8. PMC: 2927810. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01423.x. View

2.
Laden F, Schwartz J, Speizer F, Dockery D . Reduction in fine particulate air pollution and mortality: Extended follow-up of the Harvard Six Cities study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006; 173(6):667-72. PMC: 2662950. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200503-443OC. View

3.
Burnett R, Chen H, Szyszkowicz M, Fann N, Hubbell B, Pope 3rd C . Global estimates of mortality associated with long-term exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(38):9592-9597. PMC: 6156628. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1803222115. View

4.
Lepeule J, Laden F, Dockery D, Schwartz J . Chronic exposure to fine particles and mortality: an extended follow-up of the Harvard Six Cities study from 1974 to 2009. Environ Health Perspect. 2012; 120(7):965-70. PMC: 3404667. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1104660. View

5.
Kloog I, Ridgway B, Koutrakis P, Coull B, Schwartz J . Long- and short-term exposure to PM2.5 and mortality: using novel exposure models. Epidemiology. 2013; 24(4):555-61. PMC: 4372644. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318294beaa. View