» Articles » PMID: 32701991

Weighted Nearest Neighbours-based Control Group Selection Method for Observational Studies

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2020 Jul 24
PMID 32701991
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although in observational studies, propensity score matching is the most widely used balancing method, it has received much criticism. The main drawback of this method is that the individuals of the case and control groups are paired in the compressed one-dimensional space of propensity scores. In this paper, such a novel multivariate weighted k-nearest neighbours-based control group selection method is proposed which can eliminate this disadvantage of propensity score matching. The proposed method pairs the elements of the case and control groups in the original vector space of the covariates and the dissimilarities of the individuals are calculated as the weighted distances of the subjects. The weight factors are calculated from a logistic regression model fitted on the status of treatment assignment. The efficiency of the proposed method was evaluated by Monte Carlo simulations on different datasets. Experimental results show that the proposed Weighted Nearest Neighbours Control Group Selection with Error Minimization method is able to select a more balanced control group than the most widely applied greedy form of the propensity score matching method, especially for individuals characterized with few descriptive features.

Citing Articles

Association between prescription drugs and all-cause mortality risk in the UK population.

Morin J, Rolland Y, Bischoff-Ferrari H, Ocampo A, Perez K Aging Cell. 2024; 23(12):e14334.

PMID: 39364726 PMC: 11634711. DOI: 10.1111/acel.14334.


Unraveling stroke gait deviations with movement analytics, more than meets the eye: a case control study.

Pan J, Sidarta A, Wu T, Kwong W, Ong P, Tay M Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1425183.

PMID: 39104608 PMC: 11298395. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1425183.


Global multi-center and multi-modal magnetic resonance imaging study of obsessive-compulsive disorder: Harmonization and monitoring of protocols in healthy volunteers and phantoms.

Pouwels P, Vriend C, Liu F, de Joode N, Otaduy M, Pastorello B Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2022; 32(1):e1931.

PMID: 35971639 PMC: 9976605. DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1931.

References
1.
Austin P . Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharm Stat. 2010; 10(2):150-61. PMC: 3120982. DOI: 10.1002/pst.433. View

2.
Harris A, Samore M, Lipsitch M, Kaye K, Perencevich E, Carmeli Y . Control-group selection importance in studies of antimicrobial resistance: examples applied to Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococci, and Escherichia coli. Clin Infect Dis. 2002; 34(12):1558-63. DOI: 10.1086/340533. View

3.
Baser O . Too much ado about propensity score models? Comparing methods of propensity score matching. Value Health. 2006; 9(6):377-85. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00130.x. View

4.
Brookhart M, Schneeweiss S, Rothman K, Glynn R, Avorn J, Sturmer T . Variable selection for propensity score models. Am J Epidemiol. 2006; 163(12):1149-56. PMC: 1513192. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwj149. View

5.
Ripollone J, Huybrechts K, Rothman K, Ferguson R, Franklin J . Implications of the Propensity Score Matching Paradox in Pharmacoepidemiology. Am J Epidemiol. 2018; 187(9):1951-1961. PMC: 6118075. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwy078. View