» Articles » PMID: 32700923

Distractor Intrusions Are the Result of Delayed Attentional Engagement: A New Temporal Variability Account of Attentional Selectivity in Dynamic Visual Tasks

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2020 Jul 24
PMID 32700923
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When observers must identify targets among distractors in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stream, distractor intrusion errors are frequent, demonstrating the difficulty of allocating attention to the right object at the right moment in time. However, the mechanisms responsible for such intrusion errors remain disputed. We propose a new attentional engagement account of selective visual processing in RSVP tasks. Engagement is triggered by the preattentive detection of target-defining features. Critically, the success versus failure of target identification is determined by the speed of such engagement processes on individual trials. To test this account, we measured electrophysiological markers of attentional engagement (N2pc components) in 3 experiments where observers had to report the identity of a target digit in 1 of 2 lateral RSVP streams. On most trials, the target was immediately followed by a digit distractor, resulting in many posttarget distractor intrusions. Critically, N2pcs components measured on distractor intrusion trials were significantly delayed relative to trials with correct target reports. This was the case regardless of whether the target was defined by a shape cue or by its color and even when the location of shape-defined targets was known in advance. These findings show that distractor intrusions are the result of delayed attentional engagement. They demonstrate that temporal variability in attentional selectivity across trials can strongly affect visual awareness and perceptual reports. Our temporal variability account of attentional engagement offers a new framework for assessing the temporal dynamics of attention in visual object recognition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Citing Articles

Conflicting Sensory Information Sharpens the Neural Representations of Early Selective Visuospatial Attention.

Sookprao P, Benjasupawan K, Phangwiwat T, Chatnuntawech I, Lertladaluck K, Gutchess A J Neurosci. 2024; 44(33).

PMID: 38955488 PMC: 11326869. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2012-23.2024.


Transient Attention Gates Access Consciousness: Coupling N2pc and P3 Latencies Using Dynamic Time Warping.

Hosseini M, Zivony A, Eimer M, Wyble B, Bowman H J Neurosci. 2024; 44(26).

PMID: 38789261 PMC: 11211722. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1798-23.2024.


Attention and feature binding in the temporal domain.

Zivony A, Eimer M Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; 31(6):2599-2610.

PMID: 38587754 PMC: 11680606. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02493-5.


Using synchronized eye movements to assess attentional engagement.

Liu Q, Yang X, Chen Z, Zhang W Psychol Res. 2023; 87(7):2039-2047.

PMID: 36648512 PMC: 9844199. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-023-01791-2.