» Articles » PMID: 32695050

Organizational Prevention and Management Strategies for Workplace Aggression Among Child Protection Workers: A Project Protocol for the Oslo Workplace Aggression Survey (OWAS)

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2020 Jul 23
PMID 32695050
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Previous research has established exposure to workplace aggression as a significant risk factor for employee functioning, well-being, and health. However, less is known about effective prevention and management strategies. The main objectives of the current project were to determine the impact of physical and psychological aggression on the well-being, health, and work ability of employees in the child welfare service and to establish whether a strong psychosocial safety climate and an ethical infrastructure are effective with regard to protecting employees against aggression. This project may help identify the specific risks child welfare workers are exposed to, the impact of workplace aggression on their health and well-being, and the most effective strategies to manage the problem. Furthermore, the findings should be central for developing laws and regulations and to any political decision on measures to tackle aggression in the workplace.

Methods: The study will employ two prospective data collections. Firstly, a three-wave longitudinal survey with a 6-month time lag between measurement points will be conducted among all 1,500 employees in the child welfare services in Oslo Municipality, Norway. Data will have a multilevel structure and will be linked to registry data on sickness absence. Secondly, a quantitative daily diary study over a 14-day period will include 150 of the respondents from the main survey study. The survey questionnaires mainly comprise well-established and psychometrically validated indicators of workplace aggression, health and well-being, psychosocial safety climate, ethical infrastructure, and other relevant factors. The Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics (REC) in Norway (REC South East) have approved this project (project no. 28496).

Discussion: This project will identify the impact of workplace aggression on child protection workers as well as provide information on how organizations can actively manage exposure to workplace aggression. The findings may serve as a starting point for intervention studies as well as the development of policies and guidelines on how to handle workplace aggression.

Citing Articles

Exposure to Client-Perpetrated Violence in the Child Welfare Service: Prevalence and Outcomes Using Two Different Measurement Methods.

Parveen S, Nielsen M, Reme S, Finne L J Interpers Violence. 2022; 38(7-8):5963-5992.

PMID: 36269025 PMC: 9969493. DOI: 10.1177/08862605221127216.


Workplace mistreatment and insomnia: a prospective study of child welfare workers.

Nielsen M, Parveen S, Finne L Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2022; 96(1):131-141.

PMID: 35882641 PMC: 9823024. DOI: 10.1007/s00420-022-01910-3.


Assessing Workplace Bullying and Its Outcomes: The Paradoxical Role of Perceived Power Imbalance Between Target and Perpetrator.

Nielsen M, Finne L, Parveen S, Einarsen S Front Psychol. 2022; 13:907204.

PMID: 35774968 PMC: 9237549. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.907204.

References
1.
Matthews R, Kath L, Barnes-Farrell J . A short, valid, predictive measure of work-family conflict: item selection and scale validation. J Occup Health Psychol. 2010; 15(1):75-90. DOI: 10.1037/a0017443. View

2.
Law R, Dollard M, Tuckey M, Dormann C . Psychosocial safety climate as a lead indicator of workplace bullying and harassment, job resources, psychological health and employee engagement. Accid Anal Prev. 2011; 43(5):1782-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.010. View

3.
Nielsen M, Emberland J, Knardahl S . Workplace Bullying as a Predictor of Disability Retirement: A Prospective Registry Study of Norwegian Employees. J Occup Environ Med. 2017; 59(7):609-614. PMC: 5491229. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001026. View

4.
Forbes D, Alkemade N, Mitchell D, Elhai J, McHugh T, Bates G . Utility of the Dimensions of Anger Reactions-5 (DAR-5) scale as a brief anger measure. Depress Anxiety. 2013; 31(2):166-73. DOI: 10.1002/da.22148. View

5.
Sonnentag S, Fritz C . The Recovery Experience Questionnaire: development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. J Occup Health Psychol. 2007; 12(3):204-21. DOI: 10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.204. View