» Articles » PMID: 32690718

The Carbon Footprint of Household Energy Use in the United States

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2020 Jul 22
PMID 32690718
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Residential energy use accounts for roughly 20% of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the United States. Using data on 93 million individual households, we estimate these GHGs across the contiguous United States and clarify the respective influence of climate, affluence, energy infrastructure, urban form, and building attributes (age, housing type, heating fuel) in driving these emissions. A ranking by state reveals that GHGs (per unit floor space) are lowest in Western US states and highest in Central states. Wealthier Americans have per capita footprints ∼25% higher than those of lower-income residents, primarily due to larger homes. In especially affluent suburbs, these emissions can be 15 times higher than nearby neighborhoods. If the electrical grid is decarbonized, then the residential housing sector can meet the 28% emission reduction target for 2025 under the Paris Agreement. However, grid decarbonization will be insufficient to meet the 80% emissions reduction target for 2050 due to a growing housing stock and continued use of fossil fuels (natural gas, propane, and fuel oil) in homes. Meeting this target will also require deep energy retrofits and transitioning to distributed low-carbon energy sources, as well as reducing per capita floor space and zoning denser settlement patterns.

Citing Articles

Tradeoffs and synergy between material cycles and greenhouse gas emissions: Opportunities in a rapidly growing housing stock.

Igdalov S, Fishman T, Blass V J Ind Ecol. 2024; 28(6):1912-1925.

PMID: 39722863 PMC: 11667649. DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13576.


The impact of household digital transformation on household energy efficiency: Empirical evidence from Chinese households.

Lin S, He L, Lin X, Li W PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0315372.

PMID: 39652617 PMC: 11627378. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315372.


New York State Climate Impacts Assessment Chapter 04: Buildings.

Rajkovich N, Brown C, Azaroff I, Backus E, Clarke S, Enriquez J Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2024; 1542(1):214-252.

PMID: 39652388 PMC: 11668501. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.15200.


Global Land Use Change and Its Impact on Greenhouse Gas Emissions.

Li L, Awada T, Zhang Y, Paustian K Glob Chang Biol. 2024; 30(12):e17604.

PMID: 39614423 PMC: 11607391. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.17604.


Underestimation of personal carbon footprint inequality in four diverse countries.

Nielsen K, Bauer J, Debnath R, Emogor C, Geiger S, Ghai S Nat Clim Chang. 2024; 14(11):1136-1143.

PMID: 39512257 PMC: 11537954. DOI: 10.1038/s41558-024-02130-y.


References
1.
Guneralp B, Zhou Y, Urge-Vorsatz D, Gupta M, Yu S, Patel P . Global scenarios of urban density and its impacts on building energy use through 2050. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 114(34):8945-8950. PMC: 5576775. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1606035114. View

2.
Moss R, Edmonds J, Hibbard K, Manning M, Rose S, Van Vuuren D . The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature. 2010; 463(7282):747-56. DOI: 10.1038/nature08823. View

3.
Jones C, Kammen D . Spatial distribution of U.S. household carbon footprints reveals suburbanization undermines greenhouse gas benefits of urban population density. Environ Sci Technol. 2013; 48(2):895-902. DOI: 10.1021/es4034364. View

4.
Bednar D, Reames T . Fleeting energy protections: State and utility level policy responses to energy poverty in the United States during COVID-19. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2023; 99:103045. PMC: 10049889. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2023.103045. View

5.
Jones C, Kammen D . Quantifying carbon footprint reduction opportunities for U.S. households and communities. Environ Sci Technol. 2011; 45(9):4088-95. DOI: 10.1021/es102221h. View