» Articles » PMID: 32690622

Establishing Reference Ranges for Ambulatory Electrocardiography Parameters: Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Heart
Date 2020 Jul 22
PMID 32690622
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Despite the widespread and increasing use of ambulatory electrocardiography (ECG), there is no consensus on reference ranges for ambulatory electrocardiogram parameters to guide interpretation. We sought to determine population distribution-based reference ranges for parameters measured during ambulatory electrocardiogram in healthy adults, based on existing literature.

Methods: We searched multiple databases from 1950 to 2020. Articles reporting original data from ≥24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring in healthy adults were included. Data extraction and synthesis were performed according to Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. The prevalence/mean and SD for common parameters (sinus pauses, conduction abnormalities and ectopy) were extracted by age group (18-39, 40-59, 60-79 and 80+ years).

Results: We identified 33 studies involving 6466 patients. Sinus pauses of >3 s were rare (pooled prevalence <1%) across all ages. Supraventricular ectopy of >1000/24 hours increased with age, from 0% (95% CI 0% to 0%) in those aged 18-39 years to 6% (95% CI 0% to 17%) in those aged 60-79 years. Episodes of supraventricular tachycardia increased from 3% (95% CI 1% to 6%) in those aged 18-39 years to 28% (95% CI 9% to 52%) in those aged 60-79 years. Ventricular ectopy of >1000/24 hours also increased with age, from 1% (95% CI 0% to 2%) in those aged 18-39 years to 5% (95% CI 1% to 10%) in those aged 60-79 years. Episodes of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia ranged from 0% (95% CI 0% to 1%) in those aged 18-39 years to 2% (95% CI 0% to 5%) in those aged 60-79 years.

Conclusion: Despite the limitations of existing published data, this meta-analysis provides evidence-based reference ranges for ambulatory electrocardiogram parameters and highlights significant age-dependent differences that should be taken into account during interpretation.

Citing Articles

The application value of 24 h Holter monitoring indices in predicting MACEs outside the hospital within three years after PCI in patients with STEMI.

Chen B, Men L, Wang H, Yang L, Li M, Hu J Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1401343.

PMID: 39108668 PMC: 11300264. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1401343.


Diagnostic reliability of monitoring for premature atrial and ventricular complexes.

Maneheim A, Economou Lundeberg J, Persson A, Edegran A, Grotek-Cuprjak A, Juhlin T Europace. 2024; 26(8).

PMID: 39056247 PMC: 11297493. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae198.


Incidence and prevalence of hypertension in 18-40-year-old patients referred for palpitations with normal cardiac monitor findings.

Wasco C, Khan Z, Willett A, Volio A, Carter C, Kesari A J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2024; 26(6):696-702.

PMID: 38641880 PMC: 11180676. DOI: 10.1111/jch.14813.


Prevalence of frequent premature ventricular contractions and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in older women screened for atrial fibrillation in the Women's Health Initiative.

Gomez S, Larson J, Hlatky M, Rodriguez F, Wheeler M, Greenland P Heart Rhythm. 2024; 21(8):1280-1288.

PMID: 38403238 PMC: 11338634. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.02.040.


Comprehensive ECG reference intervals in C57BL/6N substrains provide a generalizable guide for cardiac electrophysiology studies in mice.

Oestereicher M, Wotton J, Ayabe S, Bou About G, Cheng T, Choi J Mamm Genome. 2023; 34(2):180-199.

PMID: 37294348 PMC: 10290602. DOI: 10.1007/s00335-023-09995-y.