Establishing Reference Ranges for Ambulatory Electrocardiography Parameters: Meta-analysis
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: Despite the widespread and increasing use of ambulatory electrocardiography (ECG), there is no consensus on reference ranges for ambulatory electrocardiogram parameters to guide interpretation. We sought to determine population distribution-based reference ranges for parameters measured during ambulatory electrocardiogram in healthy adults, based on existing literature.
Methods: We searched multiple databases from 1950 to 2020. Articles reporting original data from ≥24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring in healthy adults were included. Data extraction and synthesis were performed according to Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. The prevalence/mean and SD for common parameters (sinus pauses, conduction abnormalities and ectopy) were extracted by age group (18-39, 40-59, 60-79 and 80+ years).
Results: We identified 33 studies involving 6466 patients. Sinus pauses of >3 s were rare (pooled prevalence <1%) across all ages. Supraventricular ectopy of >1000/24 hours increased with age, from 0% (95% CI 0% to 0%) in those aged 18-39 years to 6% (95% CI 0% to 17%) in those aged 60-79 years. Episodes of supraventricular tachycardia increased from 3% (95% CI 1% to 6%) in those aged 18-39 years to 28% (95% CI 9% to 52%) in those aged 60-79 years. Ventricular ectopy of >1000/24 hours also increased with age, from 1% (95% CI 0% to 2%) in those aged 18-39 years to 5% (95% CI 1% to 10%) in those aged 60-79 years. Episodes of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia ranged from 0% (95% CI 0% to 1%) in those aged 18-39 years to 2% (95% CI 0% to 5%) in those aged 60-79 years.
Conclusion: Despite the limitations of existing published data, this meta-analysis provides evidence-based reference ranges for ambulatory electrocardiogram parameters and highlights significant age-dependent differences that should be taken into account during interpretation.
Chen B, Men L, Wang H, Yang L, Li M, Hu J Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1401343.
PMID: 39108668 PMC: 11300264. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1401343.
Diagnostic reliability of monitoring for premature atrial and ventricular complexes.
Maneheim A, Economou Lundeberg J, Persson A, Edegran A, Grotek-Cuprjak A, Juhlin T Europace. 2024; 26(8).
PMID: 39056247 PMC: 11297493. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae198.
Wasco C, Khan Z, Willett A, Volio A, Carter C, Kesari A J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2024; 26(6):696-702.
PMID: 38641880 PMC: 11180676. DOI: 10.1111/jch.14813.
Gomez S, Larson J, Hlatky M, Rodriguez F, Wheeler M, Greenland P Heart Rhythm. 2024; 21(8):1280-1288.
PMID: 38403238 PMC: 11338634. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.02.040.
Oestereicher M, Wotton J, Ayabe S, Bou About G, Cheng T, Choi J Mamm Genome. 2023; 34(2):180-199.
PMID: 37294348 PMC: 10290602. DOI: 10.1007/s00335-023-09995-y.