» Articles » PMID: 32683961

Unmet Emotional Support Needs Among Diverse Patients with Colorectal Cancer

Overview
Journal Am Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2020 Jul 21
PMID 32683961
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Social support, which is partly emotional support, is associated with adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment, quality of life, and survival. We hypothesized that the needs, sources, and availability of emotional support would vary by race and income among CRC patients and sought to quantify the emotional support and the perceived adequacy of support reported by patients.

Methods: We surveyed CRC patients from Detroit and Georgia Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registries about the quantity and quality of emotional support received from different sources. We tested differences using the chi-square test, -tests, and logistic regression.

Results: There were 1909 patients who met inclusion criteria and 1301 (68%) completed surveys. Among respondents, 68% were white, 25% black, and 7% other. Black patients were more likely to be female and younger and reported lower annual income and education. Patients reported high support from several sources. Among those with a spouse/partner (58%), 95% reported high levels of support; however, older, black, female, or lower income patients were less likely to have spouses/partners ( < .001). Patients also endorsed high support from family (88.6%), important others (82.9%), and clinicians (71.3%). Black patients were less likely than white patients to report support that was "just right" ( < .001).

Discussion: Most patients reported high emotional support from at least 1 source. Black patients were most at risk for low support or unmet support needs. Spouse/partner support was important but only available to 58% of respondents. Patients at risk for unmet emotional support needs may benefit from additional support resources.

Citing Articles

Multi-level Factors to Build Confidence and Support in Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Qualitative Study.

Chen J, Subramanian L, Skolarus T, Hawley S, Rankin A, Fetters M J Gen Intern Med. 2025; .

PMID: 39870995 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-09345-x.


Factors influencing emotional support of older adults living in the community: a scoping review protocol.

Devkota R, Cummings G, Hunter K, Maxwell C, Shrestha S, Dennett L Syst Rev. 2023; 12(1):186.

PMID: 37794514 PMC: 10548654. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02346-7.


Financial Toxicity and Its Association With Health-Related Quality of Life Among Partners of Colorectal Cancer Survivors.

Ghazal L, Abrahamse P, Ward K, Morris A, Hawley S, Veenstra C JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(4):e235897.

PMID: 37022684 PMC: 10080378. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.5897.


Coping strategies and considerations regarding low anterior resection syndrome and quality of life among patients with rectal cancer; a qualitative interview study.

Laursen B, Sorensen G, Majgaard M, Jensen L, Jacobsen K, Kjaer D Front Oncol. 2022; 12:1040462.

PMID: 36523984 PMC: 9745191. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1040462.


A dyadic survey study of partner engagement in and patient receipt of guideline-recommended colorectal cancer surveillance.

Veenstra C, Ellis K, Abrahamse P, Ward K, Morris A, Hawley S BMC Cancer. 2022; 22(1):1060.

PMID: 36229796 PMC: 9559022. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10131-3.


References
1.
Guidry J, Aday L, Zhang D, Winn R . The role of informal and formal social support networks for patients with cancer. Cancer Pract. 1997; 5(4):241-6. View

2.
Ganesh V, Agarwal A, Popovic M, Cella D, McDonald R, Vuong S . Comparison of the FACT-C, EORTC QLQ-CR38, and QLQ-CR29 quality of life questionnaires for patients with colorectal cancer: a literature review. Support Care Cancer. 2016; 24(8):3661-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3270-7. View

3.
Leung J, Smith M, McLaughlin D . Inequalities in long term health-related quality of life between partnered and not partnered breast cancer survivors through the mediation effect of social support. Psychooncology. 2016; 25(10):1222-1228. DOI: 10.1002/pon.4131. View

4.
Eom C, Shin D, Kim S, Yang H, Jo H, Kweon S . Impact of perceived social support on the mental health and health-related quality of life in cancer patients: results from a nationwide, multicenter survey in South Korea. Psychooncology. 2012; 22(6):1283-90. DOI: 10.1002/pon.3133. View

5.
Morris A, Rhoads K, Stain S, Birkmeyer J . Understanding racial disparities in cancer treatment and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2010; 211(1):105-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.02.051. View