» Articles » PMID: 32678776

Biomechanical Assessment of Two Back-support Exoskeletons in Symmetric and Asymmetric Repetitive Lifting with Moderate Postural Demands

Overview
Journal Appl Ergon
Specialty Psychology
Date 2020 Jul 18
PMID 32678776
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Two passive back-support exoskeleton (BSE) designs were assessed in terms of muscular activity, energy expenditure, joint kinematics, and subjective responses. Eighteen participants (gender-balanced) completed repetitive lifting tasks in nine different conditions, involving symmetric and asymmetric postures and using two BSEs (along with no BSE as a control condition). Wearing both BSEs significantly reduced peak levels of trunk extensor muscle activity (by ~9-20%) and reduced energy expenditure (by ~8-14%). Such reductions, though, were more pronounced in the symmetric conditions and differed between the two BSEs tested. Participants reported lower perceived exertion using either BSE yet raised concerns regarding localized discomfort. Minimal changes in lifting behaviors were evident when using either BSE, and use of both BSEs led to generally positive usability ratings. While these results are promising regarding the occupational use of BSEs, future work is recommended to consider inter-individual differences to accommodate diverse user needs and preferences.

Citing Articles

A comprehensive assessment of a passive back support exoskeleton for load handling assistance.

Ahn J, Jung H, Moon J, Kwon C, Ahn J Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3926.

PMID: 39890975 PMC: 11785785. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88471-w.


Fatigue assessment for back-support exoskeletons during repetitive lifting tasks.

Xiang X, Tanaka M, Umeno S, Kikuchi Y, Kobayashi Y Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1418775.

PMID: 39386040 PMC: 11461313. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1418775.


A comparative study of biomechanical assessments in laboratory and field settings for manual material handling tasks using extractor tools and exoskeletons.

Shakourisalim M, Wang X, Martinez K, Golabchi A, Krell S, Tavakoli M Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1358670.

PMID: 38832133 PMC: 11144878. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1358670.


Benchmarking commercially available soft and rigid passive back exoskeletons for an industrial workplace.

Mohamed Refai M, Moya-Esteban A, van Zijl L, van der Kooij H, Sartori M Wearable Technol. 2024; 5:e6.

PMID: 38510984 PMC: 10952052. DOI: 10.1017/wtc.2024.2.


Occupational exoskeletons: A roadmap toward large-scale adoption. Methodology and challenges of bringing exoskeletons to workplaces.

Crea S, Beckerle P, De Looze M, De Pauw K, Grazi L, Kermavnar T Wearable Technol. 2024; 2:e11.

PMID: 38486625 PMC: 10936259. DOI: 10.1017/wtc.2021.11.