» Articles » PMID: 32678273

Walking Characteristics Including Mild Motor Paralysis and Slow Walking Speed in Post-stroke Patients

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2020 Jul 18
PMID 32678273
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Walking speed is strongly influenced by the severity of motor paralysis in post-stroke patients. Nevertheless, some patients with mild motor paralysis still walk slowly. Factors associated with this difference in walking speed have not been elucidated. To confirm walking characteristics of patients with mild motor paralysis and slow walking speed, this study identified patient subgroups based on the association between the severity of motor paralysis and walking speed. Fugl-Meyer assessment synergy score (FMS) and the walking speed were measured (n = 42), and cluster analysis was performed based on the association between FMS and walking speed to identify the subgroups. FMS and walking speed were associated (ρ = 0.50); however, some patients walked slowly despite only mild motor paralysis. Cluster analysis using FMS and walking speed as the main variables classified patients into subgroups. Patients with mild motor paralysis (FMS: 18.4 ± 2.09 points) and slow walking speed (0.28 ± 0.14 m/s) exhibited poorer trunk stability, increased co-contraction of the shank muscle, and increased intramuscular coherence in walking compared to other clusters. This group was identified by their inability to fully utilize the residual potential of motor function. In walking training, intervention in instability and excessive cortical control may be effective.

Citing Articles

Cerebrolysin Induces Motor Recovery Along with Plastic Changes in Motoneurons and an Increase in GAP43 Protein in the Ventral Spinal Cord Following a Kainic Acid Excitotoxic Lesion in the Rat Motor Cortex.

Martinez-Torres N, Cardenas-Bedoya J, Torres-Mendoza B Neurochem Res. 2024; 50(1):31.

PMID: 39580783 DOI: 10.1007/s11064-024-04288-5.


Effect of Gait Training With Non-paretic Knee Immobilization on Lower Limb and Trunk Acceleration in a Post-stroke Hemiparetic Patient: A Case Report.

Todaka R, Kajiyama T, Kariu N, Anan M Cureus. 2024; 16(7):e64193.

PMID: 39130963 PMC: 11310361. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.64193.


Stroke walking and balance characteristics via principal component analysis.

Cho J, Ha S, Lee J, Kim M, Kim H Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):10465.

PMID: 38714823 PMC: 11076567. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-60943-5.


Characteristics of limb kinematics in the gait disorders of post-stroke patients.

Mizuta N, Hasui N, Kai T, Inui Y, Sato M, Ohnishi S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):3082.

PMID: 38321081 PMC: 10847092. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53616-w.


Rehabilitation effect of core muscle training combined with functional electrical stimulation on lower limb motor and balance functions in stroke patients.

Li Z, Guo J, Ge R, Liu C J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2023; 37(2):347-354.

PMID: 37781791 PMC: 10977437. DOI: 10.3233/BMR-230074.


References
1.
Perry J, Garrett M, GRONLEY J, Mulroy S . Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. Stroke. 1995; 26(6):982-9. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.26.6.982. View

2.
Schmid A, Duncan P, Studenski S, Lai S, Richards L, Perera S . Improvements in speed-based gait classifications are meaningful. Stroke. 2007; 38(7):2096-100. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.475921. View

3.
Khanittanuphong P, Tipchatyotin S . Correlation of the gait speed with the quality of life and the quality of life classified according to speed-based community ambulation in Thai stroke survivors. NeuroRehabilitation. 2017; 41(1):135-141. DOI: 10.3233/NRE-171465. View

4.
Kwong P, Ng S . Cutoff Score of the Lower-Extremity Motor Subscale of Fugl-Meyer Assessment in Chronic Stroke Survivors: A Cross-Sectional Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019; 100(9):1782-1787. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.01.027. View

5.
Balasubramanian C, Bowden M, Neptune R, Kautz S . Relationship between step length asymmetry and walking performance in subjects with chronic hemiparesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 88(1):43-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.004. View