» Articles » PMID: 32677896

Predictive Factors for Positive Disco-vertebral Biopsy Culture in Pyogenic Vertebral Osteomyelitis, and Impact of Fluoroscopic Versus Scanographic Guidance

Overview
Journal BMC Infect Dis
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2020 Jul 18
PMID 32677896
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The aims of this study were to identify the predictive factors for microbiological diagnosis through disco-vertebral biopsy (DVB) in patients with pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis (PVO) and negative blood cultures, and compare the performance of DVB under fluoroscopic versus scanographic guidance.

Methods: We performed a cohort study comparing positive and negative DVB among patients with PVO. All cases of PVO undergoing a DVB for microbiological diagnosis in our center were retrospectively reviewed. Infections due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis, infections on foreign device, and non-septic diseases were excluded. Anamnestic, clinical, biological, microbiological, as well as radiological data were collected from medical charts thanks to a standardized data set.

Results: A total of 111 patients were screened; 88 patients were included. Microbiological cultures were positive in 53/88 (60.2%) patients. A thickening of the paravertebral tissue ≥10 mm on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in axial MR scans was a predictive factor of DVB microbiological positivity (52.4% vs. 13.3%; p = 0.006; OR = 5.4). Overall, 51 DVB were performed under fluoroscopic guidance and 37 under scanographic guidance. Considering lumbar DVB, 25/36 (69.4%) of cases yielded positive results under fluoroscopic guidance versus 5/15 (33.3%) under scanographic guidance (p = 0.02; OR = 4.4). No adverse event linked to DVB was notified.

Conclusion: Every patient with PVO and negative blood cultures should undergo a DVB. A thickening of the paravertebral tissue ≥10 mm on MRI is associated with a higher rate of positive DVB culture. A lumbar DVB under fluoroscopic guidance is more sensitive than under scanographic guidance to identify the micro-organism involved.

Citing Articles

Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis was the specific risk factors of methicillin-susceptible spine infection: a retrospective study in a single center.

Endo K PeerJ. 2024; 12:e18432.

PMID: 39619206 PMC: 11606330. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18432.


Factors Impacting the Yield of Image-Guided Biopsy in Native Vertebral Osteomyelitis: A 10-Year Retrospective Study.

Maamari J, Tande A, Tai D, Diehn F, Ross C, Lahr B Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022; 9(12):ofac616.

PMID: 36570966 PMC: 9772870. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac616.


Value of imaging to guide interventional procedures in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a systematic literature review informing EULAR points to consider.

Bosch P, Carubbi F, Scire C, Baraliakos X, Falzon L, Dejaco C RMD Open. 2021; 7(3).

PMID: 34810228 PMC: 8609947. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001864.


Optimal microbiological sampling for the diagnosis of osteoarticular infection.

Sousa R, Carvalho A, Santos A, Abreu M EFORT Open Rev. 2021; 6(6):390-398.

PMID: 34267930 PMC: 8246105. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210011.


Review article: the current status of CT-guided needle biopsy of the spine.

Saifuddin A, Palloni V, du Preez H, Junaid S Skeletal Radiol. 2020; 50(2):281-299.

PMID: 32815040 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-020-03584-9.

References
1.
Fouquet B, Goupille P, Gobert F, Cotty P, Roulot B, Valat J . Infectious discitis diagnostic contribution of laboratory tests and percutaneous discovertebral biopsy. Rev Rhum Engl Ed. 1996; 63(1):24-9. View

2.
Gras G, Buzele R, Parienti J, Debiais F, Dinh A, Dupon M . Microbiological diagnosis of vertebral osteomyelitis: relevance of second percutaneous biopsy following initial negative biopsy and limited yield of post-biopsy blood cultures. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013; 33(3):371-5. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-013-1965-y. View

3.
Cherasse A, Martin D, Tavernier C, Maillefert J . Are blood cultures performed after disco-vertebral biopsy useful in patients with pyogenic infective spondylitis?. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003; 42(7):913. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg224. View

4.
Grammatico L, Baron S, Rusch E, Lepage B, Surer N, Desenclos J . Epidemiology of vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) in France: analysis of hospital-discharge data 2002-2003. Epidemiol Infect. 2007; 136(5):653-60. PMC: 2870846. DOI: 10.1017/S0950268807008850. View

5.
Berbari E, Kanj S, Kowalski T, Darouiche R, Widmer A, Schmitt S . 2015 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Native Vertebral Osteomyelitis in Adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2015; 61(6):e26-46. DOI: 10.1093/cid/civ482. View