» Articles » PMID: 32675833

Factors Influencing Success Rate of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection with Azoospermic Male Patients

Overview
Date 2020 Jul 18
PMID 32675833
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Azoospermia affects about 1% of men, of whom up to 15% inquire about infertility treatment. Information about predictive factors for these couples is very limited. We performed a retrospective analysis of the clinical records of 118 cycles of intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment after testicular sperm extraction for male azoospermia carried out between January 2008 and October 2015. Of those, 66 were first, 35 second, and 17 third cycles. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Predictive factors for successful pregnancy were evaluated and included male/female age, male/female body mass index, male/female nicotine use, and histological results of testes biopsies. Embryo quality and the number of embryos transferred were positively associated with pregnancy success (p = 0.003). Males whose partners conceived had a significantly lower body mass index than those whose partners did not conceive (p = 0.023). Neither female weight nor age nor smoking status of the male or female were significant factors. In cases with tubular atrophy ≥ SIGG grade 4 the chance of pregnancy was poor, irrespective of the existence of mature sperm and the number of cycles performed. Overweight male patients should be advised about weight reduction prior to treatment, and counseling about success rates should include histological and sperm-positive biopsy results.

Citing Articles

Effects of the body mass index of males on hormone levels, sperm and embryo parameters, and clinical outcomes in non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dong Y, Mai X, Xu X, Li Y Transl Androl Urol. 2023; 12(3):392-405.

PMID: 37032750 PMC: 10080349. DOI: 10.21037/tau-23-125.


Testicular Sperm Extraction and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in Management of Obstructive Azoospermia: A Two-Year Multicenter Review in Ghana.

Sefogah P, Swarray-Deen A, Hiadzi E, Adageba R, Oduro N, Nuamah H J Reprod Infertil. 2022; 23(4):264-270.

PMID: 36452196 PMC: 9674459. DOI: 10.18502/jri.v23i4.10811.

References
1.
Kate U, Pokale Y, Jadhav A, Gangane S . Chromosomal aberrations and polymorphic evaluation in males with primary infertility from Indian population. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014; 8(10):SC01-6. PMC: 4253248. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8644.4933. View

2.
Donoso P, Tournaye H, Devroey P . Which is the best sperm retrieval technique for non-obstructive azoospermia? A systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2007; 13(6):539-49. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmm029. View

3.
Dabaja A, Schlegel P . Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: an update. Asian J Androl. 2012; 15(1):35-9. PMC: 3739122. DOI: 10.1038/aja.2012.141. View

4.
Tuttelmann F, Ruckert C, Ropke A . Disorders of spermatogenesis: Perspectives for novel genetic diagnostics after 20 years of unchanged routine. Med Genet. 2018; 30(1):12-20. PMC: 5838132. DOI: 10.1007/s11825-018-0181-7. View

5.
Erdem E, Karacan M, Cebi Z, Ulug M, Arvas A, Camlibel T . Results of intracytoplasmic sperm injection performed with sperm retrieved by microscopic testicular sperm extraction in azoospermic patients. Turk J Urol. 2018; 44(6):462-466. PMC: 6179733. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2018.85282. View