» Articles » PMID: 32673048

Contextual Influences on Subjective Alcohol Response

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2020 Jul 17
PMID 32673048
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Prior research demonstrates contextual influences on drug responses in both animals and humans, although studies in humans typically focus on only one aspect of context (e.g., social) and examine a limited range of subjective experiences. The current study sought to address these limitations by examining the impact of both social and physical context on the full range of subjective alcohol effects. The sample included 448 young adult social drinkers (57% male, 66.5% White) randomly assigned to consume alcohol (target blood alcohol concentration of .08 g%) or placebo in 1 of 4 contexts (solitary lab, group lab, solitary bar, group bar). Results indicated that high arousal positive (HAP) effects of alcohol (e.g., talkative, lively) were stronger in nonbar relative to bar contexts and that low arousal positive (LAP) effects (e.g., relaxed, calm) were only present in the group lab context. There were also main effects of social context such that high arousal effects (both positive and negative) were stronger in group contexts, regardless of beverage condition. These findings highlight the importance of considering context when examining alcohol effects. Studies designed to isolate pharmacological HAP effects may benefit from a nonbar setting, and studies of LAP effects might be most effective in a simulated living room or home environment, although future studies are needed to directly address this possibility. Further, studies with an explicit focus on expectancies or that need strong control for expectancies might benefit from a group context, particularly when studying high arousal effects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Citing Articles

Effects of social drinking context on subjective effects, affect, and next-day appraisals in the natural environment.

Acuff S, Padovano H, Carpenter R, Emery N, Miranda Jr R Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2024; 48(4):755-765.

PMID: 38439602 PMC: 11015969. DOI: 10.1111/acer.15286.


Subjective intoxication predicts alcohol-related consequences at equivalent alcohol concentrations in young adults using ecological momentary assessment and alcohol sensors.

Richards V, Turrisi R, Russell M Psychol Addict Behav. 2024; 38(3):334-346.

PMID: 38271080 PMC: 11065600. DOI: 10.1037/adb0000993.


Pregaming potentiates risk between UPPS-P impulsivity and day-level drinking behavior: A test of person-environment transactions theory.

King S, Waddell J, Corbin W Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2023; 32(3):340-349.

PMID: 38032611 PMC: 11238706. DOI: 10.1037/pha0000695.


Context is a Critical for Psychoactive Drug Effects.

Greenway K CNS Drugs. 2023; 37(12):1065-1068.

PMID: 37999869 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-023-01053-0.


Cannabis use in context: Relations among impulsive personality traits, context, and cannabis problems.

Waddell J, Okey S, McDonald A, Quiroz S, Woods-Gonzalez R, Corbin W Addict Behav. 2023; 147:107841.

PMID: 37651903 PMC: 10563507. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107841.


References
1.
Sher K . Subjective effects of alcohol: the influence of setting and individual differences in alcohol expectancies. J Stud Alcohol. 1985; 46(2):137-46. DOI: 10.15288/jsa.1985.46.137. View

2.
Trim R, Schuckit M, Smith T . The relationships of the level of response to alcohol and additional characteristics to alcohol use disorders across adulthood: a discrete-time survival analysis. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2009; 33(9):1562-70. PMC: 2947374. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.00984.x. View

3.
Martin C, Earleywine M, Musty R, Perrine M, Swift R . Development and validation of the Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1993; 17(1):140-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1993.tb00739.x. View

4.
Fairbairn C, Bresin K, Kang D, Gary Rosen I, Ariss T, Luczak S . A multimodal investigation of contextual effects on alcohol's emotional rewards. J Abnorm Psychol. 2018; 127(4):359-373. PMC: 5951618. DOI: 10.1037/abn0000346. View

5.
Curtin J, Fairchild B . Alcohol and cognitive control: implications for regulation of behavior during response conflict. J Abnorm Psychol. 2003; 112(3):424-36. DOI: 10.1037/0021-843x.112.3.424. View