» Articles » PMID: 32672479

Clinical Outcomes of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Gastroenterostomy for Gastric Outlet Obstruction: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Date 2020 Jul 17
PMID 32672479
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) has been used for gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) with promising clinical outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to determine the clinical outcomes of EUS-GE for GOO.

Material And Methods: We used the keyword 'EUS-guided gastroenterostomy' to search in Pubmed, Web of science, Cochrane databases. Clinical outcomes of EUS-GE were evaluated in terms of technical success, clinical success and complications.

Results: Ten studies reported 297 patients managed with EUS-GE. Weighted pooled rates (WPR) for technical success, clinical success and complications of EUS-GE were 91% (95%CI 87%-94%), 88% (95%CI 83%-91%) and 6.8% (95%CI 4.1%-11.0%). The most common complications were abdominal pain, 6.7% (95%CI 2.5%-16.5%) and bleeding, 4.8% (95%CI 1.5%-13.9%). Two studies compared EUS-GE with surgical gastrojejunostomy (SGJ). Pooled risk ratio (RR) for technical success, clinical success and complications were 0.87 (0.78, 0.97),  = 0%; 0.92 (0.82, 1.04),  = 0%; 0.28 (0.11, 0.68),  = 0%. Three studies compared benign GOO with malignant GOO. RR for technical success and clinical success were 1.05 (0.82, 1.34),  = 0%; 0.98 (0.72, 1.33),  = 0%.

Conclusions: Although EUS-GE and SGJ had similar clinical success rates, EUS-GE had a lower complication rate. EUS-GE is a safe, effective, and minimally invasive choice for patients with GOO.

Citing Articles

Advances in Endoscopic Ultrasound in Pancreatic Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, and Palliative Care.

Zhang W, Chen J, Zhang W, Xu M Biomedicines. 2025; 13(1).

PMID: 39857661 PMC: 11762820. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13010076.


Comparative Efficacy of Endoscopic Versus Open Surgical Techniques in the Management of Gastric Outlet Obstruction: A Systematic Review.

Abdallah S, Dabas M, Morcos R, Rehman A, Shehryar A, Orakzai A Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e73690.

PMID: 39677229 PMC: 11646153. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.73690.


A review of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage and gastroenterostomy: assisted approaches and comparison with alternative techniques.

Xu R, Zhang K, Guo J, Sun S Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024; 17:17562848241299755.

PMID: 39635228 PMC: 11615986. DOI: 10.1177/17562848241299755.


Treatment of choice for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: More than clearing the road.

Jiang L, Chen X World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2024; 16(11):587-594.

PMID: 39600555 PMC: 11586723. DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i11.587.


Surgical versus endoscopic gastroenterostomy for gastric outlet obstruction: a retrospective multicentric comparative study of technical and clinical success.

Martinet E, Gonzalez J, Thobois M, Hamouda I, Hardwigsen J, Chopinet S Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024; 409(1):192.

PMID: 38900214 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03365-1.