» Articles » PMID: 32670349

A Review of Genomic Models for the Analysis of Livestock Crossbred Data

Overview
Journal Front Genet
Date 2020 Jul 17
PMID 32670349
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Livestock breeding has shifted during the past decade toward genomic selection. For the estimation of breeding values in purebred breeding schemes, genomic best linear unbiased prediction has become the method of choice. Systematic crossbreeding with the aim to utilize heterosis and breed complementary effects is widely used in livestock breeding, especially in pig and poultry breeding. The goal is to improve the performance of the crossbred animals. Due to genotype-by-environment interactions, imperfect linkage disequilibrium, and the existence of dominance and imprinting, purebred and crossbred performances are not perfectly correlated. Hence, more complex genomic models are required for crossbred populations. This study reviews and compares such models. Compared to purebred genomic models, the reviewed models were of much higher complexity due to the inclusion of dominance effects, breed-specific effects, imprinting effects, and the joint evaluation of purebred and crossbred performance data. With the model assessment work conducted until now, it is not possible to come to a clear recommendation as to which existing method is most suitable for a specific breeding program and a specific genetic trait architecture. Since it is expected that a superior method includes all the different genetic effects in a single model, a dominance model with imprinting and breed-specific SNP effects is proposed. Further progress could be made by assuming realistic covariance structures between the genetic effects of the different breeding lines, and by using larger marker panels and mixture distributions for the SNP effects.

Citing Articles

Comparison of pooled semen insemination and single colony insemination as sustainable honeybee breeding strategies.

Du M, Bernstein R, Hoppe A R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(1):231556.

PMID: 38298391 PMC: 10827426. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.231556.


Effects of the Breeding Strategy Beef-on-Dairy at Animal, Farm and Sector Levels.

Ahmed R, Schmidtmann C, Mugambe J, Thaller G Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(13).

PMID: 37443980 PMC: 10339923. DOI: 10.3390/ani13132182.


Genomic evaluation for two-way crossbred performance in cattle.

Mei Q, Liu H, Zhao S, Xiang T, Christensen O Genet Sel Evol. 2023; 55(1):17.

PMID: 36932324 PMC: 10022181. DOI: 10.1186/s12711-023-00792-4.


Comparison of meat quality and glycolysis potential of two hybrid pigs in three-way hybrid model.

Li Y, He Y, Ran J, Huang Y, Li X, Jiang H Front Vet Sci. 2023; 10:1136485.

PMID: 36875993 PMC: 9981941. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1136485.


Applications of Omics Technology for Livestock Selection and Improvement.

Chakraborty D, Sharma N, Kour S, Sodhi S, Gupta M, Lee S Front Genet. 2022; 13:774113.

PMID: 35719396 PMC: 9204716. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.774113.


References
1.
Vandenplas J, Calus M, Sevillano C, Windig J, Bastiaansen J . Assigning breed origin to alleles in crossbred animals. Genet Sel Evol. 2016; 48(1):61. PMC: 4994281. DOI: 10.1186/s12711-016-0240-y. View

2.
Esfandyari H, Sorensen A, Bijma P . A crossbred reference population can improve the response to genomic selection for crossbred performance. Genet Sel Evol. 2015; 47:76. PMC: 4587753. DOI: 10.1186/s12711-015-0155-z. View

3.
Azevedo C, Resende M, Silva F, Viana J, Valente M, Resende Jr M . Ridge, Lasso and Bayesian additive-dominance genomic models. BMC Genet. 2015; 16:105. PMC: 4549024. DOI: 10.1186/s12863-015-0264-2. View

4.
Vitezica Z, Varona L, Legarra A . On the additive and dominant variance and covariance of individuals within the genomic selection scope. Genetics. 2013; 195(4):1223-30. PMC: 3832268. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.113.155176. View

5.
Sevillano C, Vandenplas J, Bastiaansen J, Calus M . Empirical determination of breed-of-origin of alleles in three-breed cross pigs. Genet Sel Evol. 2016; 48(1):55. PMC: 4973529. DOI: 10.1186/s12711-016-0234-9. View