» Articles » PMID: 32670178

Distinct Functional Connectivity Signatures of Impaired Social Cognition in Multiple Sclerosis

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is characterized by impairments in basic cognitive functions such as information processing speed as well as in more complex, higher-order domains such as social cognition. However, as these deficits often co-occur, it has remained challenging to determine whether they have a specific pathological basis or are driven by shared biology. To identify neural signatures of social cognition deficits in MS, data were analyzed from = 29 patients with relapsing-remitting MS and = 29 healthy controls matched for age, sex, and education. We used neuropsychological assessments of information processing speed, attention, learning, working memory, and relevant aspects of social cognition (theory of mind, emotion recognition (ER), empathy) and employed neuroimaging of CNS networks using resting-state functional connectivity. MS patients showed significant deficits in verbal learning and memory, as well as implicit ER. Performance in these domains was uncorrelated. Functional connectivity analysis identified a distinct network characterized by significant associations between poorer ER and lower connectivity of the fusiform gyrus (FFG) with the right lateral occipital cortex, which also showed lower connectivity in patients compared to controls. Moreover, while ER was correlated with MS symptoms such as fatigue and motor/sensory functioning on a behavioral level, FFG connectivity signatures of social cognition deficits showed no overlap with these symptoms. Our analyses identify distinct functional connectivity signatures of social cognition deficits in MS, indicating that these alterations may occur independently from those in other neuropsychological functions.

Citing Articles

Distinguishing the role of positivity bias, cognitive impairment and emotional reactivity in the deontological preference in multiple sclerosis during moral dilemmas: a social cognition study protocol.

Zikos L, Degraeve B, Pinti A, Poupart J, Norberciak L, Kwiatkowski A Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1404876.

PMID: 39091703 PMC: 11291456. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1404876.


Cognitive and affective theory of mind in young and elderly patients with multiple sclerosis.

Montembeault M, Farley R, Ouellet J, Brando E, Tremblay A, Charest K J Neuropsychol. 2024; 19(1):39-50.

PMID: 38982586 PMC: 11891381. DOI: 10.1111/jnp.12382.


The neural substrates of social cognition deficits in newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis patients.

Ziccardi S, Genova H, Colato E, Guandalini M, Tamanti A, Calabrese M Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2024; 11(7):1798-1808.

PMID: 38872257 PMC: 11251485. DOI: 10.1002/acn3.52085.


Brain connectivity changes underlying depression and fatigue in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A systematic review.

Kampaite A, Gustafsson R, York E, Foley P, MacDougall N, Bastin M PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0299634.

PMID: 38551913 PMC: 10980255. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299634.


A systematic review and meta-analysis of socio-cognitive impairments in multiple sclerosis.

Roheger M, Grothe L, Hasselberg L, Grothe M, Meinzer M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):7096.

PMID: 38528009 PMC: 10963773. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53750-5.


References
1.
Feinstein A, Magalhaes S, Richard J, Audet B, Moore C . The link between multiple sclerosis and depression. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014; 10(9):507-17. DOI: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.139. View

2.
Polman C, Reingold S, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen J, Filippi M . Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol. 2011; 69(2):292-302. PMC: 3084507. DOI: 10.1002/ana.22366. View

3.
Hulst H, Schoonheim M, van Geest Q, Uitdehaag B, Barkhof F, Geurts J . Memory impairment in multiple sclerosis: Relevance of hippocampal activation and hippocampal connectivity. Mult Scler. 2015; 21(13):1705-12. DOI: 10.1177/1352458514567727. View

4.
Pottgen J, Dziobek I, Reh S, Heesen C, Gold S . Impaired social cognition in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013; 84(5):523-8. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-304157. View

5.
Low J, Perner J . Implicit and explicit theory of mind: state of the art. Br J Dev Psychol. 2012; 30(Pt 1):1-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02074.x. View