» Articles » PMID: 32658032

Muscle Activity, Leg Stiffness, and Kinematics During Unresisted and Resisted Sprinting Conditions

Overview
Specialty Physiology
Date 2020 Jul 14
PMID 32658032
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Zabaloy, S, Carlos-Vivas, J, Freitas, TT, Pareja-Blanco, F, Loturco, I, Comyns, T, Gálvez-González, J, and Alcaraz, PE. Muscle activity, leg stiffness and kinematics during unresisted and resisted sprinting conditions. J Strength Cond Res 36(7): 1839-1846, 2022-This study aimed to compare muscle activity, leg stiffness, and kinematics (contact and flight time [FT], stride length and frequency, and trunk angle [TA]) of unloaded sprinting to resisted sprint (RST) using different loads. Twelve male rugby players (age: 23.5 ± 5.1 years; height: 1.79 ± 0.04 m; body mass 82.5 ± 13.1 kg) performed 30-m sprints using different loading conditions (0, 10, 30 and 50% of velocity loss-Vloss-from the maximum velocity reached under unloaded condition). Muscle activity from 4 muscles (biceps femoris long head, rectus femoris [RF], gluteus medius and gastrocnemius), leg stiffness (Kleg), and kinematics were measured during the acceleration and maximum velocity (Vmax) phases of each sprint. Heavier loads led to significantly lower biceps femoris long head activation and higher rectus femoris activity (p < 0.01-0.05). Significant reductions in Kleg were observed as loading increased (p < 0.001-0.05). Kinematic variables showed substantial changes with higher loads during the acceleration and Vmax phase. In conclusion, the heavier the sled load, the higher the disruptions in muscle activity, Kleg, and kinematics. When coaches and practitioners intend to conduct resisted sprint training sessions without provoking great disruptions in sprint technique, very-heavy sled loads (greater than 30% Vloss) should be avoided. However, heavy sled loads may allow athletes to keep specific positions of the early acceleration phase for longer time intervals (i.e., first 2-3 strides during unresisted sprints).

Citing Articles

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Unresisted vs. Heavy Resisted Sprint Training Programs: Effects on Strength, Jump, Unresisted and Resisted Sprint Performance in Youth Rugby Union Players.

Zabaloy S, Healy R, Pereira L, Tondelli E, Tomaghelli L, Aparicio J J Hum Kinet. 2025; 95:199-214.

PMID: 39944984 PMC: 11812154. DOI: 10.5114/jhk/200121.


Impact of Hydraulic Resistance on Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Initial Six Steps When Sprinting Under Varying Loads.

Sasek M, Leban Z, Kranjc S, Sarabon N J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024; 9(4).

PMID: 39728247 PMC: 11676415. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk9040263.


Understanding sprint phase-specific training stimuli: a cluster analysis approach to overload conditions.

Jimenez-Reyes P, van den Tillaar R, Castano-Zambudio A, Gleadhill S, Nagahara R Front Sports Act Living. 2024; 6:1510379.

PMID: 39722738 PMC: 11669057. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1510379.


Energetic and Neuromuscular Demands of Unresisted, Parachute- and Sled-Resisted Sprints in Youth Soccer Players: Differences Between Two Novel Determination Methods.

Grassadonia G, Bruni M, Alcaraz P, Freitas T Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(22).

PMID: 39599029 PMC: 11598239. DOI: 10.3390/s24227248.


Comparison of Metabolic Power and Energy Cost of Submaximal and Sprint Running Efforts Using Different Methods in Elite Youth Soccer Players: A Novel Energetic Approach.

Grassadonia G, Alcaraz P, Freitas T Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(8).

PMID: 38676194 PMC: 11054392. DOI: 10.3390/s24082577.