» Articles » PMID: 32656521

Features, Outcomes, and Management Strategies of Male Breast Cancer: A Single Institution Comparison to Well-Matched Female Controls

Abstract

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to delineate differences in management, overall and distant disease-free survival in males diagnosed with breast cancer and treated at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center as compared to comprehensively matched female subjects. Secondary objectives included assessment of clinical and histopathologic features and recurrence score, as measured by Oncotype DX and the modified Magee equation #2.

Materials And Methods: This single institution retrospective study compared male and comprehensively matched female patients (1:2) with stage I-III breast cancer between 1994 and 2014. Recurrence risk was estimated using a modified Magee equation. Overall survival and distant disease-free survival were estimated and compared using Kaplan-Meier and Log-rank methods.

Results: Forty-five male breast cancer patients were included (stage I: 26.7%; stage II: 53.3%; stage III: 20.0%; hormone receptor positive: 97.8%; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative: 84.4%) with a median age of 63.8 (43.0-79.4) years at diagnosis. Intermediate and low recurrence scores were most common in male and female patients respectively; mean score was similar between groups (20.3 vs. 19.8). The proportion of male breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and post-mastectomy radiation was lower compared to female patients (42.2% vs. 65.3%, p=0.013; 22.7% vs. 44.4%, p=0.030, respectively). Overall survival and distant disease-free survival between male and female patients were similar.

Conclusion: Male breast cancer patient outcomes were similar compared to well-matched female patients suggesting that breast cancer specific factors are more prognostic than gender.

Citing Articles

Male Breast Cancer: An Updated Review of Patient Characteristics, Genetics, and Outcome.

Khare V, Huda F, Misra S, Amulya K, Raj N, Karn S Int J Breast Cancer. 2024; 2024:9003572.

PMID: 38559438 PMC: 10981544. DOI: 10.1155/2024/9003572.


Relevance of the 21-gene expression assay in male breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Davey M, Davey C, Bouz L, Kerin E, McFeetors C, Lowery A Breast. 2022; 64:41-46.

PMID: 35512428 PMC: 9079225. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.04.009.

References
1.
Borgen P, Wong G, Vlamis V, Potter C, Hoffmann B, Kinne D . Current management of male breast cancer. A review of 104 cases. Ann Surg. 1992; 215(5):451-7; discussion 457-9. PMC: 1242473. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199205000-00007. View

2.
Leone J, Leone J, Zwenger A, Iturbe J, Vallejo C, Leone B . Prognostic significance of tumor subtypes in male breast cancer: a population-based study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015; 152(3):601-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-015-3488-y. View

3.
Turashvili G, Gonzalez-Loperena M, Brogi E, Dickler M, Norton L, Morrow M . The 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Male Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018; 25(6):1530-1535. PMC: 5930124. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6411-z. View

4.
Cutuli B, Le-Nir C, Serin D, Kirova Y, Gaci Z, Lemanski C . Male breast cancer. Evolution of treatment and prognostic factors. Analysis of 489 cases. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2009; 73(3):246-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2009.04.002. View

5.
Cui Q, Kong D, Li Z, Ahiable P, Wang K, Wu K . Dachshund 1 is Differentially Expressed Between Male and Female Breast Cancer: A Matched Case-Control Study of Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018; 18(5):e875-e882. DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2018.01.011. View