» Articles » PMID: 32655436

Response Advantage for the Identification of Speech Sounds

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2020 Jul 14
PMID 32655436
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The ability to distinguish among different types of sounds in the environment and to identify sound sources is a fundamental skill of the auditory system. This study tested responses to sounds by stimulus category (speech, music, and environmental) in adults with normal hearing to determine under what task conditions there was a processing advantage for speech. We hypothesized that speech sounds would be processed faster and more accurately than non-speech sounds under specific listening conditions and different behavioral goals. Thus, we used three different task conditions allowing us to compare detection and identification of sound categories in an auditory oddball paradigm and in a repetition-switch category paradigm. We found that response time and accuracy were modulated by the specific task demands. The sound category itself had no effect on sound detection outcomes but had a pronounced effect on sound identification. Faster and more accurate responses to speech were found only when identifying sounds. We demonstrate a speech processing "advantage" when identifying the sound category among non-categorical sounds and when detecting and identifying among categorical sounds. Thus, overall, our results are consistent with a theory of speech processing that relies on specialized systems distinct from music and other environmental sounds.

Citing Articles

Processing of auditory novelty in human cortex during a semantic categorization task.

Nourski K, Steinschneider M, Rhone A, Dappen E, Kawasaki H, Howard 3rd M Hear Res. 2024; 444:108972.

PMID: 38359485 PMC: 10984345. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.108972.


Sound category habituation requires task-relevant attention.

Moskowitz H, Sussman E Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1228506.

PMID: 37942141 PMC: 10628171. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1228506.

References
1.
Pisoni D . On the perception of speech sounds as biologically significant signals. Brain Behav Evol. 1979; 16(5-6):330-50. PMC: 3512094. DOI: 10.1159/000121875. View

2.
Lewis J, Brefczynski J, Phinney R, Janik J, DeYoe E . Distinct cortical pathways for processing tool versus animal sounds. J Neurosci. 2005; 25(21):5148-58. PMC: 6724809. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0419-05.2005. View

3.
Chartrand J, Peretz I, Belin P . Auditory recognition expertise and domain specificity. Brain Res. 2008; 1220:191-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.01.014. View

4.
Ballas J . Common factors in the identification of an assortment of brief everyday sounds. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993; 19(2):250-67. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.19.2.250. View

5.
Bigand E, Delbe C, Gerard Y, Tillmann B . Categorization of extremely brief auditory stimuli: domain-specific or domain-general processes?. PLoS One. 2011; 6(10):e27024. PMC: 3203171. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027024. View