» Articles » PMID: 32654815

Is There a Correlation Between Paternal Age and Aneuploidy Rate? An Analysis of 3,118 Embryos Derived from Young Egg Donors

Overview
Journal Fertil Steril
Date 2020 Jul 14
PMID 32654815
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To investigate a possible correlation between chromosomal aberrations and paternal age, analyzing embryos derived from young oocyte donors, with available preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy results from day 5/6 trophectoderm biopsy obtained by next-generation sequencing for all 24 chromosomes.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Canadian fertility centre.

Patient(s): A total of 3,118 embryos from 407 male patients, allocated into three paternal age groups: group A, ≤39 years (n = 203); group B, 40-49 years (n = 161); group C, ≥50 years (n = 43).

Intervention(s): None.

Main Outcome Measure(s): The primary outcomes were aneuploidy, euploidy, mosaicism, and blastocyst formation rates. Secondary endpoints were comparison of specific chromosome aneuploidy, segmental and complex (involving two chromosomes + mosaicism >50%) aneuploidy, and analysis of overall percentage of chromosomal gains and losses within each group.

Result(s): The study included 437 in vitro fertilization (IVF) antagonist cycles using 302 oocyte donors in which preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy was performed. Overall, 70.04% of embryos were euploid, 13.9% were aneuploid, and 16.06% were mosaic. No significant differences among paternal age groups A, B, and C were found in euploidy rates (69.2%, 70.6%, 71.4%, respectively), aneuploidy rates (14.7%, 12.8%, 13.9%, respectively) or mosaicism rates (16.1%, 16.6%, 13.6%; respectively). The fertilization rate was lower in group C compared with group B (76.35% vs. 80.09%). No difference was found in blastocyst formation rate between the study groups (median 52% [interquartile range, 41%, 67%] vs. 53% [42%, 65%] vs. 52% [42%, 64%], respectively). A generalized linear mixed model regression analysis for embryo ploidy rates found older oocyte donor age to be independently associated with embryo aneuploidy (odds ratio = 1.041; 95% CI, 1.009-1.074). The rate of segmental aneuploidies was significantly higher in the older versus younger paternal age group (36.6% vs. 19.4%).

Conclusion(s): No association was found between paternal age and aneuploidy rates in embryos derived from IVF cycles using young oocyte donors, after adjusting for donor, sperm, and IVF cycle characteristics. Advanced paternal age ≥ 50, compared with younger paternal ages, was associated with a lower fertilization rate and increased rate of segmental aberrations.

Citing Articles

The impact of advanced paternal age on the live birth rate in patients undergoing Assisted Reproduction treatment: Findings from an analysis at a public reproductive center in Brazil.

Maia V, Rodrigues A, Sousa V, Barcelos M, Goulart J, Paulini F JBRA Assist Reprod. 2024; 28(4):650-657.

PMID: 39254471 PMC: 11622406. DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20240053.


Livebirth rates are influenced by an interaction between male and female partners' age: analysis of 59 951 fresh IVF/ICSI cycles with and without male infertility.

Datta A, Campbell S, Diaz-Fernandez R, Nargund G Hum Reprod. 2024; 39(11):2491-2500.

PMID: 39241250 PMC: 11532605. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deae198.


The impact of paternal age on cumulative assisted reproductive technology outcomes.

Farabet C, Pirtea P, Benammar A, de Ziegler D, Marchiori C, Vallee A Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 10:1294242.

PMID: 38298503 PMC: 10828963. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1294242.


Advanced Paternal Age: A New Indicator for the Use of Microfluidic Devices for Sperm DNA Fragmentation Selection.

Escude-Logares L, Serrano-Novillo C, Uroz L, Galindo A, Marquez C J Clin Med. 2024; 13(2).

PMID: 38256591 PMC: 10816896. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020457.


Y chromosome AZFc microdeletion may have negative effect on embryo euploidy: a retrospective cohort study.

Jiang W, Xie Q, Li X, Yang Y, Luan T, Ni D BMC Med Genomics. 2023; 16(1):324.

PMID: 38082270 PMC: 10712062. DOI: 10.1186/s12920-023-01760-z.