» Articles » PMID: 32652989

Implementation of Data Access and Use Procedures in Clinical Data Warehouses. A Systematic Review of Literature and Publicly Available Policies

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2020 Jul 13
PMID 32652989
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The promises of improved health care and health research through data-intensive applications rely on a growing amount of health data. At the core of large-scale data integration efforts, clinical data warehouses (CDW) are also responsible for data governance, managing data access and (re)use. As the complexity of the data flow increases, greater transparency and standardization of criteria and procedures are required in order to maintain objective oversight and control. Therefore, the development of practice oriented and evidence-based policies is crucial. This study assessed the spectrum of data access and use criteria and procedures in clinical data warehouses governance internationally.

Methods: We performed a systematic review of (a) the published scientific literature on CDW and (b) publicly available information on CDW data access, e.g., data access policies. A qualitative thematic analysis was applied to all included literature and policies.

Results: Twenty-three scientific publications and one policy document were included in the final analysis. The qualitative analysis led to a final set of three main thematic categories: (1) requirements, including recipient requirements, reuse requirements, and formal requirements; (2) structures and processes, including review bodies and review values; and (3) access, including access limitations.

Conclusions: The description of data access and use governance in the scientific literature is characterized by a high level of heterogeneity and ambiguity. In practice, this might limit the effective data sharing needed to fulfil the high expectations of data-intensive approaches in medical research and health care. The lack of publicly available information on access policies conflicts with ethical requirements linked to principles of transparency and accountability. CDW should publicly disclose by whom and under which conditions data can be accessed, and provide designated governance structures and policies to increase transparency on data access. The results of this review may contribute to the development of practice-oriented minimal standards for the governance of data access, which could also result in a stronger harmonization, efficiency, and effectiveness of CDW.

Citing Articles

Large language models generating synthetic clinical datasets: a feasibility and comparative analysis with real-world perioperative data.

Barr A, Quan J, Guo E, Sezgin E Front Artif Intell. 2025; 8:1533508.

PMID: 39974356 PMC: 11836953. DOI: 10.3389/frai.2025.1533508.


Ethics practices associated with reusing health data: an assessment of patient registries.

van den Akker O, Stark S, Strech D BMC Med. 2024; 22(1):577.

PMID: 39633389 PMC: 11619252. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03799-w.


"Goldmine" or "big mess"? An interview study on the challenges of designing, operating, and ensuring the durability of Clinical Data Warehouses in France and Belgium.

Priou S, Kempf E, Jankovic M, Lame G J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024; 31(11):2699-2707.

PMID: 39269930 PMC: 11491596. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocae244.


Public Involvement and Engagement in Big Data Research: Scoping Review.

Teodorowski P, Jones E, Tahir N, Ahmed S, Rodgers S, Frith L J Particip Med. 2024; 16:e56673.

PMID: 39150751 PMC: 11364952. DOI: 10.2196/56673.


The Cancer Clinical Library Database (CCLD) from the Korea-Clinical Data Utilization Network for Research Excellence (K-CURE) Project.

Lee S, Choi Y, Kim H, Hong M, Park P, Kwak I Cancer Res Treat. 2024; 57(1):19-27.

PMID: 39010797 PMC: 11729314. DOI: 10.4143/crt.2024.218.


References
1.
Shin S, Kim W, Lee J . Characteristics desired in clinical data warehouse for biomedical research. Healthc Inform Res. 2014; 20(2):109-16. PMC: 4030054. DOI: 10.4258/hir.2014.20.2.109. View

2.
Van Eaton E, Devlin A, Devine E, Flum D, Tarczy-Hornoch P . Achieving and sustaining automated health data linkages for learning systems: barriers and solutions. EGEMS (Wash DC). 2015; 2(2):1069. PMC: 4371442. DOI: 10.13063/2327-9214.1069. View

3.
Ohno-Machado L . To share or not to share: that is not the question. Sci Transl Med. 2012; 4(165):165cm15. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004454. View

4.
McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel D, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C . PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016; 75:40-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021. View

5.
Bouzille G, Westerlynck R, Defossez G, Bouslimi D, Bayat S, Riou C . Sharing Health Big Data for Research - A Design by Use Cases: The INSHARE Platform Approach. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018; 245:303-307. View