» Articles » PMID: 32650339

Variability in Patient Sociodemographics, Clinical Characteristics, and Healthcare Service Utilization Among 107,302 Treatment Seeking Smokers in Ontario: A Cross-sectional Comparison

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2020 Jul 11
PMID 32650339
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Since 2005, the Smoking Treatment for Ontario Patients (STOP) program has provided smoking cessation treatment of varying form and intensity to smokers through 11 distinct treatment models, either in-person at partnering healthcare organizations or remotely via web or telephone. We aimed to characterize the patient populations reached by different treatment models.

Methods: We linked self-report data to health administrative databases to describe sociodemographics, physical and mental health comorbidity, healthcare utilization and costs. Our sample consisted of 107,302 patients who enrolled between 18Oct2005 and 31Mar2016, across 11 models operational during different time periods.

Results: Patient populations varied on sociodemographics, comorbidity burden, and healthcare usage. Enrollees in the Web-based model were youngest (median age: 39; IQR: 29-49), and enrollees in primary care-based Family Health Teams were oldest (median: 51; IQR: 40-60). Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and hypertension were the most common physical health comorbidities, twice as prevalent in Family Health Teams (32.3% and 30.8%) than in the direct-to-smoker (Web and Telephone) and Pharmacy models (13.5%-16.7% and 14.7%-17.7%). Depression, the most prevalent mental health diagnosis, was twice as prevalent in the Addiction Agency (52.1%) versus the Telephone model (25.3%). Median healthcare costs in the two years up to enrollment ranged from $1,787 in the Telephone model to $9,393 in the Addiction Agency model.

Discussion: While practitioner-mediated models in specialized and primary care settings reached smokers with more complex healthcare needs, alternative settings appear better suited to reach younger smokers before such comorbidities develop. Although Web and Telephone models were expected to have fewer barriers to access, they reached a lower proportion of patients in rural areas and of lower socioeconomic status. Findings suggest that in addition to population-based strategies, embedding smoking cessation treatment into existing healthcare settings that reach patient populations with varying disparities may enhance equitable access to treatment.

Citing Articles

Targeted distribution of nicotine patches by mail to rural regions of Canada: Predictors of patch use.

Schell C, Godinho A, Chaiton M, Leatherdale S, Cunningham J Tob Prev Cessat. 2025; 11.

PMID: 39867464 PMC: 11758359. DOI: 10.18332/tpc/197456.


A Gender-Informed Smoking Cessation App for Women: Protocol for an Acceptability and Feasibility Study.

Melamed O, Mehra K, Panda R, Minian N, Veldhuizen S, Zawertailo L JMIR Res Protoc. 2024; 13:e60677.

PMID: 39433391 PMC: 11668997. DOI: 10.2196/60677.


Artificial intelligence and social accountability in the Canadian health care landscape: A rapid literature review.

Anawati A, Fleming H, Mertz M, Bertrand J, Dumond J, Myles S PLOS Digit Health. 2024; 3(9):e0000597.

PMID: 39264934 PMC: 11392241. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000597.


Healthcare providers' perspectives on implementing a brief physical activity and diet intervention within a primary care smoking cessation program: a qualitative study.

Minian N, Mehra K, Lingam M, Dragonetti R, Veldhuizen S, Zawertailo L BMC Prim Care. 2024; 25(1):16.

PMID: 38184559 PMC: 10770944. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-02259-3.


Incidence of chronic disease following smoking cessation treatment: A matched cohort study using linked administrative healthcare data in Ontario, Canada.

Baliunas D, Voci S, Selby P, de Oliveira C, Kurdyak P, Rosella L PLoS One. 2023; 18(7):e0288759.

PMID: 37494345 PMC: 10370896. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288759.


References
1.
Costello M, Sproule B, Victor J, Leatherdale S, Zawertailo L, Selby P . Effectiveness of pharmacist counseling combined with nicotine replacement therapy: a pragmatic randomized trial with 6,987 smokers. Cancer Causes Control. 2010; 22(2):167-80. DOI: 10.1007/s10552-010-9672-9. View

2.
Minian N, Baliunas D, Noormohamed A, Zawertailo L, Giesbrecht N, Hendershot C . The effect of a clinical decision support system on prompting an intervention for risky alcohol use in a primary care smoking cessation program: a cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci. 2019; 14(1):85. PMC: 6708174. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-019-0935-x. View

3.
Chaiton M, Callard C . Mind the Gap: Disparities in Cigarette Smoking in Canada. Tob Use Insights. 2019; 12:1179173X19839058. PMC: 6437323. DOI: 10.1177/1179173X19839058. View

4.
Bauld L, Judge K, Platt S . Assessing the impact of smoking cessation services on reducing health inequalities in England: observational study. Tob Control. 2007; 16(6):400-4. PMC: 2807194. DOI: 10.1136/tc.2007.021626. View

5.
Desveaux L, Agarwal P, Shaw J, Hensel J, Mukerji G, Onabajo N . A randomized wait-list control trial to evaluate the impact of a mobile application to improve self-management of individuals with type 2 diabetes: a study protocol. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016; 16(1):144. PMC: 5109669. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-016-0381-5. View