» Articles » PMID: 32640750

Where Sounds Occur Matters: Context Effects Influence Processing of Salient Vocalisations

Overview
Journal Brain Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Jul 10
PMID 32640750
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The social context in which a salient human vocalisation is heard shapes the affective information it conveys. However, few studies have investigated how visual contextual cues lead to differential processing of such vocalisations. The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is implicated in processing of contextual information and evaluation of saliency of vocalisations. Using functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS), we investigated PFC responses of young adults (N = 18) to emotive infant and adult vocalisations while they passively viewed the scenes of two categories of environmental contexts: a domestic environment (DE) and an outdoors environment (OE). Compared to a home setting (DE) which is associated with a fixed mental representation (e.g., expect seeing a living room in a typical house), the outdoor setting (OE) is more variable and less predictable, thus might demand greater processing effort. From our previous study in Azhari et al. (2018) that employed the same experimental paradigm, the OE context was found to elicit greater physiological arousal compared to the DE context. Similarly, we hypothesised that greater PFC activation will be observed when salient vocalisations are paired with the OE compared to the DE condition. Our finding supported this hypothesis: the left rostrolateral PFC, an area of the brain that facilitates relational integration, exhibited greater activation in the OE than DE condition which suggests that greater cognitive resources are required to process outdoor situational information together with salient vocalisations. The result from this study bears relevance in deepening our understanding of how contextual information differentially modulates the processing of salient vocalisations.

Citing Articles

Emotion Regulation, Effort and Fatigue: Complex Issues Worth Investigating.

Lewczuk K, Wizla M, Oleksy T, Wyczesany M Front Psychol. 2022; 13:742557.

PMID: 35250704 PMC: 8888450. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.742557.


Psychological and Physiological Signatures of Music Listening in Different Listening Environments-An Exploratory Study.

Tervaniemi M, Makkonen T, Nie P Brain Sci. 2021; 11(5).

PMID: 34063693 PMC: 8147775. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11050593.

References
1.
Jung Y, Larsen B, Walther D . Modality-Independent Coding of Scene Categories in Prefrontal Cortex. J Neurosci. 2018; 38(26):5969-5981. PMC: 6595974. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0272-18.2018. View

2.
Rauschecker J, Scott S . Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing. Nat Neurosci. 2009; 12(6):718-24. PMC: 2846110. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2331. View

3.
Pinheiro A, Barros C, Pedrosa J . Salience in a social landscape: electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant and infrequent vocal change. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015; 11(1):127-39. PMC: 4692326. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsv103. View

4.
Azhari A, Lim M, Bizzego A, Gabrieli G, Bornstein M, Esposito G . Physical presence of spouse enhances brain-to-brain synchrony in co-parenting couples. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):7569. PMC: 7200679. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-63596-2. View

5.
Fruhholz S, Grandjean D . Processing of emotional vocalizations in bilateral inferior frontal cortex. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013; 37(10 Pt 2):2847-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.10.007. View