» Articles » PMID: 32637194

Strategies for Managing the Risk of Mucogingival Changes During Impacted Maxillary Canine Treatment

Overview
Journal Turk J Orthod
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2020 Jul 9
PMID 32637194
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Gingival recession is a frequent mucogingival defect in the adult population. It affects the esthetics and is related to hypersensitivity and a high risk of periodontal attachment loss. The connection between orthodontic treatment and periodontal health has been debated for a long time. A healthy periodontium can be preserved during safe orthodontic tooth movement even in patients with poor mucogingival anatomy. This article aimed to review the strategies around managing the risks of mucogingival and apical root changes owing to maxillary canine impaction, with a special focus on gingival recession and impacted maxillary canine treatment. Maxillary canines are the second most frequently impacted teeth after the third molars. They can be located in the labial or buccal aspect of the alveolar bone. If interceptive procedures fail, the next step is the challenging and time-consuming comprehensive orthodontic-surgical treatment. Determining the exact impacted canine location, its relation to the adjacent teeth and structures, the least invasive surgical approach, and the best path for traction are all a part of the standard diagnostic process. It has also been suggested that orthodontists should evaluate periodontal risks to achieve the best possible results. Clinical examination and cone beam computed tomography provide valuable information for the treatment plan that yields good results with a healthy periodontium.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of the relationship between maxillary canine impaction with arch dimensions and maxillary sinus dimensions using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT ).

Farhadifard H, Shokri A, Salehzadeh M, Farhadian M, Ahmadpour Y World J Plast Surg. 2024; 13(2):32-38.

PMID: 39193243 PMC: 11346695. DOI: 10.61186/wjps.13.2.32.


Comparisons of Two Different Treatment Methods for Impacted Maxillary Canines: A Retrospective Study.

Fekonja A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(8).

PMID: 38673647 PMC: 11051128. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082374.


The VISTA Approach in Canine Disimpaction.

Galluccio G, Impellizzeri A, Pietrantoni A, De Stefano A, La Monaca G, Pippi R Methods Protoc. 2021; 4(3).

PMID: 34449664 PMC: 8395768. DOI: 10.3390/mps4030057.


Management of maxillary impacted canines: A prospective study of orthodontists' preferences.

AlQahtani H Saudi Pharm J. 2021; 29(5):384-390.

PMID: 34135665 PMC: 8180458. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2021.03.010.

References
1.
Leonardi M, Armi P, Franchi L, Baccetti T . Two interceptive approaches to palatally displaced canines: a prospective longitudinal study. Angle Orthod. 2004; 74(5):581-6. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0581:TIATPD>2.0.CO;2. View

2.
Eslami E, Barkhordar H, Abramovitch K, Kim J, Masoud M . Cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional radiography in visualization of maxillary impacted-canine localization: A systematic review of comparative studies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017; 151(2):248-258. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.07.018. View

3.
Boyd R . Clinical assessment of injuries in orthodontic movement of impacted teeth. II. Surgical recommendations. Am J Orthod. 1984; 86(5):407-18. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9416(84)90034-4. View

4.
Schubert M, Proff P, Kirschneck C . Improved eruption path quantification and treatment time prognosis in alignment of impacted maxillary canines using CBCT imaging. Eur J Orthod. 2018; 40(6):597-607. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjy028. View

5.
Ronay V, Sahrmann P, Bindl A, Attin T, Schmidlin P . Current status and perspectives of mucogingival soft tissue measurement methods. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011; 23(3):146-56. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00424.x. View