» Articles » PMID: 32636922

Evaluation of Novel Precision Viticulture Tool for Canopy Biomass Estimation and Missing Plant Detection Based on 2.5D and 3D Approaches Using RGB Images Acquired by UAV Platform

Overview
Journal Plant Methods
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2020 Jul 9
PMID 32636922
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The knowledge of vine vegetative status within a vineyard plays a key role in canopy management in order to achieve a correct vine balance and reach the final desired yield/quality. Detailed information about canopy architecture and missing plants distribution provides useful support for farmers/winegrowers to optimize canopy management practices and the replanting process, respectively. In the last decade, there has been a progressive diffusion of UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) technologies for Precision Viticulture purposes, as fast and accurate methodologies for spatial variability of geometric plant parameters. The aim of this study was to implement an unsupervised and integrated procedure of biomass estimation and missing plants detection, using both the 2.5D-surface and 3D-alphashape methods.

Results: Both methods showed good overall accuracy respect to ground truth biomass measurements with high values of R (0.71 and 0.80 for 2.5D and 3D, respectively). The 2.5D method led to an overestimation since it is derived by considering the vine as rectangular cuboid form. On the contrary, the 3D method provided more accurate results as a consequence of the alphashape algorithm, which is capable to detect each single shoot and holes within the canopy. Regarding the missing plants detection, the 3D approach confirmed better performance in cases of hidden conditions by shoots of adjacent plants or sparse canopy with some empty spaces along the row, where the 2.5D method based on the length of section of the row with lower thickness than the threshold used (0.10 m), tended to return false negatives and false positives, respectively.

Conclusions: This paper describes a rapid and objective tool for the farmer to promptly identify canopy management strategies and drive replanting decisions. The 3D approach provided results closer to real canopy volume and higher performance in missing plant detection. However, the dense cloud based analysis required more processing time. In a future perspective, given the continuous technological evolution in terms of computing performance, the overcoming of the current limit represented by the pre- and post-processing phases of the large image dataset should mainstream this methodology.

Citing Articles

Comparative Analysis of TLS and UAV Sensors for Estimation of Grapevine Geometric Parameters.

Ferreira L, Sousa J, Lourenco J, Peres E, Morais R, Padua L Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(16).

PMID: 39204879 PMC: 11360376. DOI: 10.3390/s24165183.


UAV-based individual plant detection and geometric parameter extraction in vineyards.

Canturk M, Zabawa L, Pavlic D, Dreier A, Klingbeil L, Kuhlmann H Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1244384.

PMID: 38034574 PMC: 10682715. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1244384.


A miniaturized phenotyping platform for individual plants using multi-view stereo 3D reconstruction.

Wu S, Wen W, Gou W, Lu X, Zhang W, Zheng C Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:897746.

PMID: 36003825 PMC: 9393617. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.897746.


Beyond the traditional NDVI index as a key factor to mainstream the use of UAV in precision viticulture.

Matese A, di Gennaro S Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):2721.

PMID: 33526834 PMC: 7851140. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81652-3.

References
1.
Torres-Sanchez J, Lopez-Granados F, Serrano N, Arquero O, Pena J . High-Throughput 3-D Monitoring of Agricultural-Tree Plantations with Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Technology. PLoS One. 2015; 10(6):e0130479. PMC: 4479442. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130479. View