» Articles » PMID: 32635173

Clinical Performance of Short Expandable Dental Implants for Oral Rehabilitation in Highly Atrophic Alveolar Bone: 3-year Results of a Prospective Single-Center Cohort Study

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Jul 9
PMID 32635173
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objectives: Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQOL) is compromised during the post-implant healing period, especially when vertical augmentation is required. A long-term trial sought to evaluate a short dental implant system with an apically expandable macro-design.

Materials And Methods: Over 4.5 years, patients with limited vertical alveolar bone were consecutively recruited into this prospective cohort study. Implant success rate, OHRQOL (Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)-14), implant stability, and crestal bone changes were evaluated.

Results: Data from 30 patients (mean age: 64.6 years, range 44-83) were analyzed, which related to 104 implants (53 in the maxilla, 51 in the mandible). Over the mean follow-up (42.6 ± 16.4 months), the implant success rate was 94.7% in the mandible (two implants lost) and 83.6% in the maxilla (four implants lost; = 0.096), and the prosthetic success rate was 100%. The median OHIP-14 scores improved from 23 (interquartile range (IQR) 9-25.5) to 2 (IQR 0-5; < 0.001). The mean implant stability quotient (ISQ) was 71.2 ± 10.6 for primary stability and 73.7 ± 13.3 ( = 0.213) for secondary stability, without significant maxilla-versus-mandible differences ( ≥ 0.066). Compared to the baseline, median crestal bone changes after loading were 1.0 mm (IQR 0-1.3) and 1.0 mm (IQR 0.2-1.2) in the maxilla and mandible ( = 0.508), respectively, at the end of the first year, 1.1 mm (IQR 0-1.3) and 1.0 mm (IQR 0.1-1.2) ( = 0.382), respectively, at the end of the second year, and 1.2 mm (IQR 0-1.9) and 1.1 mm (IQR 0.1-1.2) ( = 0.304), respectively, at the end of the third year.

Conclusions: In patients with limited vertical bone height, short implants with optimized macro-design constitute a reliable method for functional rehabilitation, avoiding extensive alveolar bone augmentation.

Citing Articles

Dental Implant with Porous Structure and Anchorage: Design and Bench Testing in a Calf Rib Model Study.

Lovera K, Vanaclocha V, Atienza C, Vanaclocha A, Jorda-Gomez P, Saiz-Sapena N Materials (Basel). 2025; 18(3).

PMID: 39942366 PMC: 11820065. DOI: 10.3390/ma18030700.


Barbed Dental Ti6Al4V Alloy Screw: Design and Bench Testing.

Lovera-Prado K, Vanaclocha V, Atienza C, Vanaclocha A, Jorda-Gomez P, Saiz-Sapena N Materials (Basel). 2023; 16(6).

PMID: 36984107 PMC: 10054258. DOI: 10.3390/ma16062228.


Short versus Standard Length Implants with Sinus Floor Elevation for the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla.

Schiegnitz E, Hill N, Sagheb K, Konig J, Sagheb K, Al-Nawas B Acta Stomatol Croat. 2022; 56(2):143-153.

PMID: 35821724 PMC: 9262115. DOI: 10.15644/asc56/2/5.

References
1.
Anitua E, Flores J, Alkhraisat M . Transcrestal Sinus Lift Using Platelet Concentrates in Association to Short Implant Placement: A Retrospective Study of Augmented Bone Height Remodeling. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015; 18(5):993-1002. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12383. View

2.
Karoussis I, Bragger U, Salvi G, Burgin W, Lang N . Effect of implant design on survival and success rates of titanium oral implants: a 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI Dental Implant System. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004; 15(1):8-17. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00983.x. View

3.
Becker W, Becker B, Hujoel P, Abu Ras Z, Goldstein M, Smidt A . Prospective clinical trial evaluating a new implant system for implant survival, implant stability and radiographic bone changes. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011; 15(1):15-21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00333.x. View

4.
Tian J, Neiva R, Coelho P, Witek L, Tovar N, Lo I . Alveolar Ridge Expansion: Comparison of Osseodensification and Conventional Osteotome Techniques. J Craniofac Surg. 2018; 30(2):607-610. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004956. View

5.
Gupta R, Padmanabhan T . Resonance frequency analysis. Indian J Dent Res. 2011; 22(4):567-73. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.90300. View